2019
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1611582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian General Linear Modeling Approach to Cortical Surface fMRI Data Analysis

Abstract: Cortical surface fMRI (cs-fMRI) has recently grown in popularity versus traditional volumetric fMRI, as it allows for more meaningful spatial smoothing and is more compatible with the common assumptions of isotropy and stationarity in Bayesian spatial models. However, as no Bayesian spatial model has been proposed for cs-fMRI data, most analyses continue to employ the classical, voxel-wise general linear model (GLM) (Worsley and Friston 1995). Here, we propose a Bayesian GLM for cs-fMRI, which employs a class … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this was not observed for the proportion of voxels deemed active or false negative rates. It remains possible that surface based analysis will be preferable if a spatial model is used instead; see, for example Mejia et al (2017). However, this topic is outside the scope of the current manuscript.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, this was not observed for the proportion of voxels deemed active or false negative rates. It remains possible that surface based analysis will be preferable if a spatial model is used instead; see, for example Mejia et al (2017). However, this topic is outside the scope of the current manuscript.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bayesian computation techniques, such as integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) (Rue et al 2009), could then be used to compute the necessary posterior quantities. Such an approach has previously been used in the context of identifying brain areas activated during a task fMRI experiment (Mejia et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let T be the number of time points in the fMRI time series and let N be the number of voxels in the brain. For a subject, the following GLM model is present (Mejia et al, 2017):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INLA method can compute approximations to the posterior distributions and manage large data sets in shorter time by using the sparsity of Gaussian Markov Random Fields (GMRFs). Moreover, INLA is faster than MCMC (Rue et al, 2017) and can be easily implemented using R-INLA package (Mejia, Yue, Bolin, Lindren, & Lindquist, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%