2017
DOI: 10.1101/155481
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Framework for Multiple Trait Colocalization from Summary Association Statistics

Abstract: 44Most genetic variants implicated in complex diseases by genome-wide association 45 studies (GWAS) are non-coding, making it challenging to understand the causative 46 genes involved in disease. Integrating external information such as quantitative trait 47 locus (QTL) mapping of molecular traits (e.g., expression, methylation) is a powerful 48 approach to identify the subset of GWAS signals explained by regulatory effects. In 49 particular, expression QTLs (eQTLs) help pinpoint the responsible gene among the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated the colocalization status of a gene by calculating the posterior probability that the genetic and functional associations derived from (i) distinct causal SNPs (PP3), and (ii) a shared causal SNP (PP4) (24). Of the 177 significant features, 101 (57 unique genes) were considered as colocalized based on their high PP4 (> 0.8), in line with previous literature (25,26) ( Supplementary Table S3). The strongest posterior probabilities for colocalization were for FLOT1, RP5-1115A15.1, and CKB (PP3 = 0, PP4 = 1).…”
Section: Colocalizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We evaluated the colocalization status of a gene by calculating the posterior probability that the genetic and functional associations derived from (i) distinct causal SNPs (PP3), and (ii) a shared causal SNP (PP4) (24). Of the 177 significant features, 101 (57 unique genes) were considered as colocalized based on their high PP4 (> 0.8), in line with previous literature (25,26) ( Supplementary Table S3). The strongest posterior probabilities for colocalization were for FLOT1, RP5-1115A15.1, and CKB (PP3 = 0, PP4 = 1).…”
Section: Colocalizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…π k = 1 × 10 −3 , 5 × 10 −4 , 5 × 10 −4 for the patterns where SNPs are associated with only one, exactly two, and all of the three traits, respectively. Here we compared the true and estimated FDRs and power to detect associations to all three traits and to at least one trait, based on Primo versus two competing methods, "moloc" [16] and Fisher's method [43]. The results with correctly specified, under-specified and over-specified marginal non-null proportions (θ 1 j 's) are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Accurate Estimation Of Proportions (π) Even For Very Sparse mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple methods exist to assess, for example, the extent of co-localization between GWAS loci and eQTLS [8183], or mQTLs [84], and have been successfully applied to elucidate genetic architecture of schizophrenia [78, 80•, 83, 85]. However, these methods make a number of necessary simplifying assumptions regarding allelic heterogeneity and linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure, as well as assuming only a single causal variant or eQTL.…”
Section: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%