2019
DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2019-0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian framework for identifying consistent patterns of microbial abundance between body sites

Abstract: Recent studies have found that the microbiome in both gut and mouth are associated with diseases of the gut, including cancer. If resident microbes could be found to exhibit consistent patterns between the mouth and gut, disease status could potentially be assessed non-invasively through profiling of oral samples. Currently, there exists no generally applicable method to test for such associations. Here we present a Bayesian framework to identify microbes that exhibit consistent patterns between body sites, wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ASV was defined to exhibit a consistent PASTA pattern, if either one of the three possible quantities was associated between oral and pancreatic tissues or intestinal site samples: (1) The probability of absence ( p ), which denotes the probability of observing a relative abundance of zero, (2) The non-zero mean relative abundance (ω), which denotes mean relative abundance among those samples in which ASV is present; and (3) The mean relative abundance across all samples (μ). Further information about the data model, approach, and performance of the PASTA test has been published in detail [ 28 ] and briefly summarized in Supplemental Material 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ASV was defined to exhibit a consistent PASTA pattern, if either one of the three possible quantities was associated between oral and pancreatic tissues or intestinal site samples: (1) The probability of absence ( p ), which denotes the probability of observing a relative abundance of zero, (2) The non-zero mean relative abundance (ω), which denotes mean relative abundance among those samples in which ASV is present; and (3) The mean relative abundance across all samples (μ). Further information about the data model, approach, and performance of the PASTA test has been published in detail [ 28 ] and briefly summarized in Supplemental Material 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This probability can be understood as a rejection threshold, where a value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant (i.e., strong evidence of association) and a value of less than 0.1 was considered as marginally significant (i.e., moderate evidence of association). Further information about the data model, approach, and performance of the PASTA test have been published in detail 44 .…”
Section: Concordance and Pairwise Stratified Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%