2018
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1379404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Approach for Estimating Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in fMRI Data

Abstract: Dynamic functional connectivity, i.e., the study of how interactions among brain regions change dynamically over the course of an fMRI experiment, has recently received wide interest in the neuroimaging literature. Current approaches for studying dynamic connectivity often rely on ad-hoc approaches for inference, with the fMRI time courses segmented by a sequence of sliding windows. We propose a principled Bayesian approach to dynamic functional connectivity, which is based on the estimation of time varying ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shrinkage belongs to the more general family of Bayesian approaches. Fully Bayesian approaches, such as that proposed by Warnick et al (2017), use a latent variable model in which the unknown connectivity for each subject gives rise to the unobserved “true” time series plus random noise, and subjects are drawn from some population distribution. In this framework, prior distributions are assumed on the parameters controlling the population distribution and the random noise, including the variance within and across subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shrinkage belongs to the more general family of Bayesian approaches. Fully Bayesian approaches, such as that proposed by Warnick et al (2017), use a latent variable model in which the unknown connectivity for each subject gives rise to the unobserved “true” time series plus random noise, and subjects are drawn from some population distribution. In this framework, prior distributions are assumed on the parameters controlling the population distribution and the random noise, including the variance within and across subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the vast majority of analyses have utilized a sliding-window approach to estimate dynamic connectivity, which tends to produce artificial fluctuations in connectivity [ 19 ]. Recently, some efforts have been made to separate dynamic fluctuations caused by true changes versus those caused by statistical uncertainty [ 13 , 18 , 20 ]. Model-based approaches, such as Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models, were investigated by [ 21 ] and found to provide more reliability than sliding-window approaches for dFC detection due to decreased sensitivity to parameter settings and susceptibility to noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Baker et al [22] applied HMMs to band-limited amplitude envelopes of source reconstructed MEG data and identified brain states that match up to previously established resting-state networks and which fluctuate at time scales two orders of magnitude faster than previously shown. Warnick et al [23] introduce a Bayesian approach to HMMs and dynamic functional connectivity, where they identify latent network states, but they do so in a manner where they assume the network/connectivity structures at each time point are related within one “super-graph”. They impose a sparsity inducing Markov random field prior on the presence of the edges in the super-graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%