2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concretely, in buyback policy 2, the unit wholesale price w and buyback prices, b and , r b between a manufacturer and a retailer are coordinated as the Nash bargaining solutions (Nagarajan and Sosic, 2008;Du et al, 2011). The coordinated prices…”
Section: Supply Chain Coordination In Sc Under E-commercementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concretely, in buyback policy 2, the unit wholesale price w and buyback prices, b and , r b between a manufacturer and a retailer are coordinated as the Nash bargaining solutions (Nagarajan and Sosic, 2008;Du et al, 2011). The coordinated prices…”
Section: Supply Chain Coordination In Sc Under E-commercementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it is the absolute requirement for all members under the integrated supply chain to obtain the more expected profits than those under the decentralized supply chain. In order to achieve the increases in profits of all members under the integrated supply chain, a variety of supply chain coordination approaches between all members have been discussed by Cachon and Netessine (2004), Chauhan and Proth (2005), Nagarajan and Sosic (2008), Du et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network DEA models have been extended to allow different types of internal structure. Kao [40] classified the network DEA models into nine types, i.e., the independent model by Zhu [38], the system distance measure model by Chen et al [41], the process distance measure model by Chen et al [42], the factor distance measure model by Chen [43], the slacks-based measure model by Tone and Tsutsui [44], the ratio-form system efficiency model by Chen [45], the ratio-form process efficiency model (Chen et al [36], Cook et al [41]), the game theoretic model by Du et al [46] and the value-based model by Wei and Chang [47]. Besides, Kao [40] differentiated five types of the internal structure of the network DEA model, including the basic two-stage structure, the general two-stage structure, the series structure, the parallel structure, and the dynamic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, note that it is the absolute requirement for all members under an integrated supply chain to bring the more expected profits to all of them than those under a decentralized supply chain. For the purposed of achievement of the increases in profits of all members under an integrated supply chain, a variety of supply chain coordination approaches between all members in a supply chain have been discussed by Cachon and Netessine (2004), Du et al (2011), Kaya (2010, Tsay et al (1999), Wei et al (2012), Wu (2012), Yan and Sun (2012), and Yano and Gilbert (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of the game theory into not only the optimal pricing strategy, but also the supply chain coordination in a RSC has been discussed by Du et al (2011), Kaya (2010, Wei et al (2012), Wu (2012), and Yan and Sun (2012). Here, it is necessary to analyze members' behaviors in both a supply chain (SC) and a RSC to determine the optimal operation for those SCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%