1996
DOI: 10.21236/ada311317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Ballistic Evaluation of Ti-6A1-4V versus Long Rod Penetrators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proposed model, the front layer thickness is set to equal to zero. The validation of the model is done by comparing its predicted penetration depths with the corresponding measurements of [4,5] at each impact velocity. The input data to the model are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: For the Penetration Of A Semi-infinite Rha Target By A Du Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the proposed model, the front layer thickness is set to equal to zero. The validation of the model is done by comparing its predicted penetration depths with the corresponding measurements of [4,5] at each impact velocity. The input data to the model are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: For the Penetration Of A Semi-infinite Rha Target By A Du Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed model, the target flow stress of titanium semi-infinite armor is determined by matching the measured penetration depth into titanium semi-infinite armor of Ref. [5] with the corresponding prediction of the present model at each impact velocity. Based on the predicted flow stress multipliers, Equation (20) is determined for the titanium semi-infinite armor and fed into the model.…”
Section: For the Penetration Of A Titanium Semi-infinite Target By A mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gooch et al [3][4][5][6] have tested titanium 6Al-4V against laboratory-scale long-rod penetrators with L/D of ten, 13, and 20 and impact velocities up to 2,000 m/s. The penetrators were tungsten alloys with masses of 65, 162, and 105 gm, respectively.…”
Section: Ballistic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until 1993, a major impediment to the consideration of titanium for armor applications had been the lack of baseline titanium ballistic performance data against modem penetrators. Since 1993, the U.S. Army Research Laboratory has published a series of papers in the literature that baseline the performance of titanium against modem kinetic energy penetrators, with the most complete ballistic data derived from joint tests with the French-German Research Institute Saint Louis in France [3,4,5]. Additionally, significant research efforts and ballistic testing continue on efforts to develop low cost titanum alloys [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%