2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A balanced randomised placebo controlled blinded phase IIa multi-centre study to investigate the efficacy and safety of AUT00063 versus placebo in subjective tinnitus: The QUIET-1 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal research suggests that the drug is very effective at reducing hyperactivity in the auditory brainstem after noise exposure in rodents (Anderson et al, 2018; Glait et al, 2018) and hence might be expected to be effective against similarly generated tinnitus in humans. However, a randomized controlled trial of AUT00063 in humans with subjective tinnitus, QUIET-1, was halted because of lack of efficacy (Hall et al, 2019b). This discrepancy between animal models of tinnitus and clinical trials in humans has various possible explanations: firstly, the pathophysiology of tinnitus in humans may be different from that of laboratory animals (and there remain significant questions about whether the animals do experience tinnitus, and whether our methods for detecting the symptom are reasonable).…”
Section: Obstacles To a Curementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal research suggests that the drug is very effective at reducing hyperactivity in the auditory brainstem after noise exposure in rodents (Anderson et al, 2018; Glait et al, 2018) and hence might be expected to be effective against similarly generated tinnitus in humans. However, a randomized controlled trial of AUT00063 in humans with subjective tinnitus, QUIET-1, was halted because of lack of efficacy (Hall et al, 2019b). This discrepancy between animal models of tinnitus and clinical trials in humans has various possible explanations: firstly, the pathophysiology of tinnitus in humans may be different from that of laboratory animals (and there remain significant questions about whether the animals do experience tinnitus, and whether our methods for detecting the symptom are reasonable).…”
Section: Obstacles To a Curementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other treatments decreasing tinnitus percept or targeting central auditory processing pathways are at a preclinical phase (Schilder et al, 2019). The modulator of voltage-gated potassium channels (Kv3.1) (AUT00063) was not effective in alleviating tinnitus symptoms (Hall et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Pharmacology-based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the studies of the molecular mechanisms of tinnitus have also made some progress [178,179]. Most of the medications treating tinnitus are off-label use, and drugs specifically developed for tinnitus have been proven ineffective [118,122,124]. The efficacy of the same drug observed in different studies might be inconsistent, and the incidence of side effects is higher than tinnitus management.…”
Section: Discussion On Tinnitus Medications and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, AUT00063 has been shown to inhibit spontaneous hyperactivity induced by noise exposure in the fusiform cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus, as well as multiunit activity recorded in the inferior colliculus in mice [122,123]. However, a daily dose of 800 mg AUT00063 for 28 days showed safety and tolerance but resulted in no change in TFI scores [124]. Patients with intermittent typewriter-like tinnitus all responded positively to carbamazepine, and therefore, it is speculated that carbamazepine alleviates tinnitus by hindering the recovery from inactivation of the voltage-gated sodium channel and thus suppressing subsequent ephaptic axonal transmission in the cochlear nerve [125].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%