1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.1995.tb00271.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Backpropagation Neural Network Model for Semi‐rigid Steel Connections

Abstract: The analysis of semirigid steel structure connections based on exact theoretical modeling, which is demanding and time consuming if all the nonlinear parameters of the problem are taken into account, can be avoided provided that enough experimental measurements exist and an appropriate predictor can be constructed from them. A supervised learning backpropagation neural network approach is proposed in this paper for the construction of this model free predictor. A number of experimental momentrotation curves fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the ratio between the predicted initial rotation stiffness values by the LGP single and team solutions and likewise those obtained from European design code, ANNs [16], GP/SA [27,28], Kishi et al [3] and experimental values are illustrated in Figs. [13][14][15]. Performance statistics of models for initial rotational stiffness prediction are presented in 9.35%, 12.85% and 0.9923, 1.73%, 2.22%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of the ratio between the predicted initial rotation stiffness values by the LGP single and team solutions and likewise those obtained from European design code, ANNs [16], GP/SA [27,28], Kishi et al [3] and experimental values are illustrated in Figs. [13][14][15]. Performance statistics of models for initial rotational stiffness prediction are presented in 9.35%, 12.85% and 0.9923, 1.73%, 2.22%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators have concentrated on predicting the beamcolumn steel joints behavior using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) [12][13][14][15][16]. In spite of the generally successful performance of ANNs, they are black-box models that do not give a deep insight into the process of using available information to obtain a solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model consists of three beam-column elements and has a total of 10 degrees of freedom. Consistent mass matrix for the beam-column elements and a lumped mass (1.2×10 4 The column base has a free horizontal DOF so that base excitation can be imposed. Tangent stiffness of the rotational spring element for the column base is derived from the phenomenological model [10] and non-pinching cyclic behavior is assumed.…”
Section: Performance Under Earthquake Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdalla and Stavroulakis [14] have used neural networks to predict the global moment-rotation curve of single web angle beam-to-column joints. De Lima et al [15] employed neural networks for assessment of beam-to-column joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%