1994
DOI: 10.1016/0890-6955(94)90047-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A back-propagation algorithm applied to tool wear monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study, a total of 262 data consisting of 244 data for training and 18 data for test were used. The input and output data used were normalized between 0 and 1 (Purushothaman and Srinivasa, 1994).…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study, a total of 262 data consisting of 244 data for training and 18 data for test were used. The input and output data used were normalized between 0 and 1 (Purushothaman and Srinivasa, 1994).…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectively, reference (Elanayar et al, 1990) utilised this experiment to relate tool wear, surface finish, and cutting forces and reported a high but unquantified achievement rate. Reference (Purushothaman and Srinivasa, 1994) approach and methodology is similar to that of (Rangwala and Dornfield, 1987), but differs in terms of sensor signal inputs, data processing. Reference (Purushothaman and Srinivasa, 1994) argues that there is no need to use dimensionally selected features, instead, they use the amplified components of the cutting force signal as sampled, together with the three cutting parameters (Rangwala andDornfield, 1987, Dornfeld, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference (Purushothaman and Srinivasa, 1994) approach and methodology is similar to that of (Rangwala and Dornfield, 1987), but differs in terms of sensor signal inputs, data processing. Reference (Purushothaman and Srinivasa, 1994) argues that there is no need to use dimensionally selected features, instead, they use the amplified components of the cutting force signal as sampled, together with the three cutting parameters (Rangwala andDornfield, 1987, Dornfeld, 1990). Reference (Tanner and Loh, 1994) utilises the cutting forces as their sensor signal inputs with an additional component depiction the occurrence of tool breakage to monitor the cutting process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations