2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp40220c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A B3LYP-DBLOC empirical correction scheme for ligand removal enthalpies of transition metal complexes: parameterization against experimental and CCSD(T)-F12 heats of formation

Abstract: Average ligand removal enthalpies of 30 differently coordinated mono-nuclear fourth-row transition metal complexes taken from a database recently considered by Johnson and Becke [Can. J. Chem., 2009, 8, 1369] have been computed in the gas phase using unrestricted pseudo-spectral (LACV3P) and fully analytic (qzvp(-g)) B3LYP including a recently developed empirical dispersion correction. Heats of formation of neutral singlet reactants and neutral, potentially high spin, products have been taken from NIST's Organ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(99 reference statements)
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Included are ionization potentials and electron affinities, transition state energetics, and a model that covers transition metals (redox potentials, spin splittings, and atomization energies). The errors remain consistent with those discussed above; MUEs of ∼1 kcal/mole for second and third row atoms, and 2–3 kcal/mole for transition metals . The increased error in case of transition metals is due to a combination of the greater complexity of the electronic structure of transition metal atoms and chemical bonding, and the paucity and lower quality of experimental data for transition‐metal‐containing systems.…”
Section: Jaguar Featuressupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Included are ionization potentials and electron affinities, transition state energetics, and a model that covers transition metals (redox potentials, spin splittings, and atomization energies). The errors remain consistent with those discussed above; MUEs of ∼1 kcal/mole for second and third row atoms, and 2–3 kcal/mole for transition metals . The increased error in case of transition metals is due to a combination of the greater complexity of the electronic structure of transition metal atoms and chemical bonding, and the paucity and lower quality of experimental data for transition‐metal‐containing systems.…”
Section: Jaguar Featuressupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The reference state ligand field diagram is defined to be the electronic state of lowest spin multiplicity for the metal cation in its most common oxidation state. Each operator is associated with a B3LYP‐DBLOC correction parameter which has been fit to large and diverse databases of experimental spin‐splitting, redox, and ligand removal energetics.…”
Section: Jaguar Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hughes et al. recently presented a special dispersion correction for ligand‐removal enthalpies of transition‐metal complexes 29…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our experience, [18] our CCSD(T)-F12 protocol should yield accurate energies for transition metal compounds, with an error of approximately 10 kJ mol À1 . The experimental room temperature enthalpy change for the hydrogenation and hydroformylation of propene are À123.9 and À109.9 kJ mol À1 respectively, [19] compared to calculated values of À122.9 and À108.4 kJ mol À1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%