2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A B-WIM algorithm considering the modeling of the bridge dynamic response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Latest generation B-WIM systems use BIL calibration from measured bridge response. 128 Boundary conditions of a real bridge are somewhat between simply supported and fixed, so getting accurate BIL is difficult. 70 There are basically two categories of methods for extracting actual BIL.…”
Section: Instrumentation On a Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Latest generation B-WIM systems use BIL calibration from measured bridge response. 128 Boundary conditions of a real bridge are somewhat between simply supported and fixed, so getting accurate BIL is difficult. 70 There are basically two categories of methods for extracting actual BIL.…”
Section: Instrumentation On a Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods and detailed comparative reviews on BIL identification techniques can be found in literature. 55,[128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142] To have a brief insight on how BIL is extracted using bridge response time histories, basic fundamental method is briefly described for completeness of the review.…”
Section: Instrumentation On a Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Put another way, the influence line theory is a static concept, so the raw strain data measured by strain sensors are not applicable to the influence line theory because real bridges are subject to various dynamic loads. 42 To render the influence line theory applicable, it is necessary to preprocess the raw strain signals so that the static strain can be extracted. According to Jian et al, 31 the raw bridge strain signals contain mainly two components, which are non-vehicle component and vehicle-induced component, and the latter one can be further divided into vehicle-induced dynamic component and vehicle-induced static component.…”
Section: Preprocessing Of Bridge Strain Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed earlier, the BWIM technique is built on the influence line theory, 41 which describes the relationship among static load, load position, and static bridge responses. Put another way, the influence line theory is a static concept, so the raw strain data measured by strain sensors are not applicable to the influence line theory because real bridges are subject to various dynamic loads 42 . To render the influence line theory applicable, it is necessary to preprocess the raw strain signals so that the static strain can be extracted.…”
Section: Strain Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed earlier, the BWIM is essentially the inverse problem of the influence line theory. The influence line theory is built on the static structural analysis, whereas the bridge strain signals measured in practice are inherently dynamic due to the moving vehicle, 34 and the frequently observed drift of strain signals needs to be considered as well. Therefore, the measured strain signals are pre‐processed first in this study to remove the unwanted trend and dynamic components.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%