A A Global Comparison of Initial Pharmacy Education Curricula: An Exploratory Study

Abstract

Background: Time-tabled curricular contents and syllabi reflect the actual delivery of the academic programme and one of key quality components in healthcare professional education. There is a need of global evidence base of Initial Pharmacy Education and Training (IPET) curricula for assisting the advancement of IPET globally.
 Objectives: To seek the differences and similarities among IPET curricula and to explore relative trends and weighting of IPET curricula globally.
 Methods: Sample curricular documents were collected purposively either through a parallel survey study investigating the structures and processes of IPET globally in collaboration with the International Pharmaceutical Federation Education (FIPEd), or through research team network. Collected textual documents containing IPET curricular contents were analysed by a mixed approach of the comparative content and framework analyses, using curriculum clusters in a guideline from the PHARMINE project.
 Results: IPET curricular documents were collected from 16 countries and territories. The study showed study years spent in the IPET years range from four to six years, and a sample mean of average syllabus time spent per year is 728 hours/year (excluding outlier). There was a biggest variance in the pharmacy practice cluster (PRAC) among samples, ranging from 49.3 to 12.8%, showing a significant negative correlation with the chemical science cluster (CHEM) g = -0.77 (p<.0001). Categorised further into three curricular content groups, the study identified that there was variances in a tendency of the curricular orientation of science or practice-focus between countries.
 Conclusion: The study allowed a first global comparison of IPET curricula from all WHO regions, which provided a better understanding of current IPET practice and delivery across nations and established evidence base to address challenges and gaps for further improvement of IPET curriculum in any country.
 
 Article Type: Original Research

Predictors of Pharmacy Student Performance on Written and Clinical Examinations in a Flipped Classroom Curriculum

“…Further, despite some suggestion that the early didactic curricula of bachelors, masters, and professional doctorate pharmacy programs are similar, type of degree could influence generalizability of the results. 30…”

Perceptions of European students' representative associations about clinical pharmacy undergraduate education

“…In Europe, education is still very much devoted to basic sciences, while in the United States of America (USA), there is a higher load of patientcentred care teaching and learning hours (Nunes-da-Cunha et al, 2016). Irrespective of the need to increase the number of clinically-oriented teaching and learning hours in Europe, efforts have been made to gear a transformation of pharmacy education towards a more patient-centred education throughout European pharmacy schools (International Pharmaceutical Federation -FIP, 2013;Arakawa, Bruno-Tomé & Bates, 2020).…”

“…The Bologna Declaration, signed back in 1999, harmonised undergraduate education in pharmaceutical sciences in Europe, foreseeing a five-year degree comprising at least four years of full-time theoretical and practical training and a six-month traineeship in a community pharmacy open to the public or a hospital (European Commission, 2013). Although the structure of pharmaceutical sciences curricula offered across Europe is harmonised, there are many variations in the content taught, the number of contact hours dedicated to each area of pharmaceutical knowledge, and the amount of practical teaching in the different pharmacy faculties (Arakawa, Bruno-Tomé & Bates, 2020).…”

Developing a FIP handbook for implementing competency-based education in pharmacy education

“…Fit-for-purpose IPET in pharmacy contributes to achieving the UN's SDG 4 on quality education (United Nations, 2015). In this context, IPET refers to "a pre-service professional higher education programme that leads a graduate to a formal registration as a pharmacist with a statutory board of each country where the education is offered" (Arakawa et al, 2020). However, health professional education has not kept up with ever-changing challenges, including new infectious, environmental, and behavioural risks during rapid demographic and epidemiological changes (Frenk et al, 2010).…”