A 6LoWPAN Sensor Node Mobility Scheme Based on Proxy Mobile IPv6

Kim, Jin-Ho; Haw, Rim; Cho, Eung Jun; Hong, Choong Seon; Lee, Sungwon

doi:10.1109/tmc.2011.240

Cited by 35 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…SNs were used as LMA and MAG to carry out the mobility with same PMIPv6 operations. In [25], 6LoWMSN based on PMIPv6 was proposed to allow multi-hop communication in 6LoWPAN. Solutions in [26][27][28] are based on PMIPv6 protocol, addressing different 6LoWPAN WSN application areas for Improving HO performance.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Researchers in the field have used both types of protocols with different perspectives to improve the HO performance in 6LoWPAN WSN. Most of the leading solutions in [9][10][11][12][13] are PMIPv6 based, focus on reducing HO latency only and pay less attention towards packet loss and signaling cost. The packet loss incurs due to heavy signaling cost and connection termination in PMIPv6-HO, is unacceptable in time critical applications [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Advanced Prediction Based Mobility Support for 6LoWPAN Wireless Sensor Networks

Khan¹,

Mir²

2017

IJITCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Wireless Sensor Nodes (SNs), the key elements for building Internet of Things (IOT) have been deployed widely in order to get and transmit information over the internet. IPv6 over low power personal area network (6LoWPAN) enabled their connectivity with IPV6 networks. 6LoWPAN has mobility and it can find an extensive application space only if provides mobility support efficiently. Existing mobility schemes are focused on reducing handoff (HO) latency and pay less attention towards packet loss and signaling cost. In time critical applications under IOT, packet loss and excessive signaling cost are not acceptable. This paper proposes a scheme based on advanced mobility prediction for reducing extra signaling cost and packet loss that incurs due to connection termination in traditional schemes such as Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) handover. In our proposed scheme 6LoWPAN WSN architecture with IPv6 addressing is presented. Based on this architecture the mobility algorithm is proposed for reducing signaling cost, packet loss by buffering mechanism and HO latency in particular. In the algorithm layer 2 (L2) and layer 3 (L3) HO is performed simultaneously with prior HO prediction with no Care of Address (CoA) configuration which also reduces signaling cost to some extent. The proposed scheme is analyzed theoretically and evaluated for different performance metrics. Data results showed significant improvements in reducing packet loss, signaling cost and HO latency when compared to standard PMIPv6 in time critical scenarios.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advanced Prediction Based Mobility Support for 6LoWPAN Wireless Sensor Networks

Khan¹,

Mir²

2017

IJITCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, PMIPv6 suffers from another barrier which is the limitation of MN on its domain. This could be a problematic for IoT equipment which uses diverse applications [83,84]. The SPMIPv6 protocol, proposed by [26][27][28], is the first protocol that works on smart sensor network-based localized mobility management (SLMA), particularity focusing on energy efficiency.…”

Section: Ip-enabled Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobility management for IoT: a survey

Ghaleb

Subramaniam

Zukarnain

et al. 2016

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Thing (IoT) or also referred to as IP-enabled wireless sensor network (IP-WSN) has become a rich area of research. This is due to the rapid growth in a wide spectrum of critical application domains. However, the properties within these systems such as memory size, processing capacity, and power supply have led to imposing constraints on IP-WSN applications and its deployment in the real world. Consequently, IP-WSN is constantly faced with issues as the complexity further rises due to IP mobility. IP mobility management is utilized as a mechanism to resolve these issues. The management protocols introduced to support mobility has evolved from host-based to network-based mobility management protocols. The presence of both types of solutions is dominant but depended on the nature of systems being deployed. The mobile node (MN) is involved with the mobility-related signaling in host-based protocols, while network-based protocols shield the host by transferring the mobility-related signaling to the network entities. The features of the IoT are inclined towards the network-based solutions. The wide spectrum of strategies derived to achieve enhanced performance evidently displays superiority in performance and simultaneous issues such as long handover latency, intense signaling, and packet loss which affects the QoS for the real-time applications. This paper extensively reviews and discusses the algorithms developed to address the challenges and the techniques of integrating IP over WSNs, the attributes of mobility management within the IPv4 and IPv6, respectively, and special focus is given on a comprehensive review encompassing mechanisms, advantages, and disadvantages on related work within the IPv6 mobility management. The paper is concluded with the proposition of several pertinent open issues which are of high research value.

show abstract

“…It is also mentioned that the main contribution to the overall handover time is the layer-2 handover delay and they measured average layer-2 handover delay is about 100 ms. Also highlighted that layer-2 handover has been performed without any optimization and thus a lower delay might be obtained as the movement detection delay/time (mdd/mdt) was proved to be negligible, with an average measured time of less than a millisecond. Jinho Kim et al [27] defined a protocol for 6LoWPAN mobile sensor node, named 6LoMSN, based on Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6). They stated that conventional PMIPv6 standard supports only singlehop networks and cannot be applied to multihop-based 6LoWPAN.They also defined the movement notification of a 6LoMSN in order to support its mobility in multihop-based 6LoWPAN environments.…”

Section: Survey Of Network Based Mobility Management Schemes and 6lowmentioning

confidence: 99%