2021
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2021.3074384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 56-Gb/s PAM4 Receiver Analog Front-End With Fixed Peaking Frequency and Bandwidth in 40-nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[63] Southern University of Science and Technology demonstrated an 024201-5 CMOS process optical receiver analog front-end. [64] Wuhan University designed a 25 Gb/s inductorless optical receiver, with a high sensitivity and wide dynamic range. [65] (a) (b) Fig.…”
Section: The 2d Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[63] Southern University of Science and Technology demonstrated an 024201-5 CMOS process optical receiver analog front-end. [64] Wuhan University designed a 25 Gb/s inductorless optical receiver, with a high sensitivity and wide dynamic range. [65] (a) (b) Fig.…”
Section: The 2d Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To satisfy the stringent bandwidth requirement while improving the spectral efficiency, IEEE 802.3bs recommends PAM4 signaling to fulfill 200/400 Gb/s Ethernet by employing 4×50 Gb/s and 8×50 Gb/s multi-channel links [3,4]. The PAM4 signaling encodes the most significant bit (MSB) and the least significant bit (LSB), into one single symbol, thus enhancing the spectral efficiency and mitigating the bandwidth limitation for both channel and front-end circuit [5,6]. Nevertheless, the PAM4 signaling exhibits a more severe inter-symbol interference (ISI) due to the in-trinsic 9.5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) penalty [7,8] and 12 different transitions compared to NRZ format.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the FR-4 backplane channel has more serious insertion loss at high frequency, while the traditional CTLE structure cannot pro-vide sufficient gain. Ref [19] uses the inductance peaking technology to expand the bandwidth and improve the peaking gain, but the traditional inductance is difficult to integrate and the impedance is fixed. In addition, considering that the channel loss will be affected by the environment and the non-ideal characteristics like skin effect, Ref [20] proposes a CTLE with adjustable zero-pole based on the source degradation structure, which will better adjust the CTLE high frequency gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%