2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-019-01216-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 50K SNP array reveals genetic structure for bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These numbers compare favorably with similar studies of non-model organisms ( e.g. , Lundregan et al 2018 ; Kim et al 2018 ; Judkins et al 2020 ). Overall, no relationship was found between the call rate per sample and DNA concentration, in contrast to Hagen et al (2013) who reported that failed samples had significantly lower DNA concentrations than successful ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These numbers compare favorably with similar studies of non-model organisms ( e.g. , Lundregan et al 2018 ; Kim et al 2018 ; Judkins et al 2020 ). Overall, no relationship was found between the call rate per sample and DNA concentration, in contrast to Hagen et al (2013) who reported that failed samples had significantly lower DNA concentrations than successful ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The total success rate of 94.31% across all breeds, and the segregating rate of 86.02% in DSN, was high in comparison to other described works with the Affymetrix technology, varying, for example, from a calling rate of 46.16% in the Atlantic salmon [ 39 ], 74.81% in water buffalo [ 40 ], to 90.48% in the bald eagle [ 37 ]. The decision to use SNPs that were informative on the Illumina BovineSNP50 was straightforward not only because these SNPs were successfully called but also because these SNPs, which are common on both chips, allow the joint analysis of animals genotyped with the Illumina BovineSNP50 and the DSN200k SNP chip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Generally, the in silico conversion, physical or genetic distance between markers, and allele frequencies are the main selection motives [ 31 – 34 ]. Nevertheless, a similar approach prioritizing high impact and/or rare variants, and candidate variants to important traits as we implemented was also used for the catfish 250 k array [ 35 ], GeneSeek Genomic Profilerℱ F250 chip [ 36 ], and 50 k Axiom bald eagle SNP chip [ 37 ]. In our case, we were able to select informative variants in DSN and keep a uniform distribution across the genome in DSN including variants targeting all haplotype blocks longer than 5 kb, whereof most were even longer than 1 kb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, only a handful of medium‐high density SNP chips have been designed for noncommercial wild species such as house sparrow (Hagen et al, 2013; Lundregan et al, 2018), great tit (van Bers et al, 2012; Kim et al, 2018), polar bear (Malenfant et al, 2015), flycatcher (Kawakami et al, 2014), fur seal (Humble et al, 2020), Florida scrub‐jay (Chen et al, 2016) and bald eagle (Judkins et al, 2020). These SNP chips for wild species generate a quantity of genomic data that can be used, for example, to infer relatedness (Humble et al, 2020) and population structure (Hagen et al, 2013; Judkins et al, 2020; Malenfant et al, 2015; Viengkone et al, 2016), analyse the genomic architecture of traits (Duntsch et al, 2020; Husby et al, 2015; Kim et al, 2018; Laine et al, 2019; Lundregan et al, 2018; Santure et al, 2013, 2015; Silva et al, 2017), characterise copy number variants in the genome (da Silva et al, 2018; Kim et al, 2018) and investigate the genomic landscape of linkage and linkage disequilibrium (Hagen et al, 2020; Kawakami et al, 2014; van Oers et al, 2014). SNP chips developed for model organisms or agricultural systems have also been utilised to address evolutionary, ecological, and conservation questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medium (~thousands to tens of thousands of loci) and high (~hundreds of thousands of loci) density SNP chips have been routinely developed for commercial species, often with a focus on enabling production gains from genome wide association studies, genomic selection and prediction (https://www.illum ina.com/areas -of-inter est/agrig enomi cs/plant -anima l-genom ics/genot yping.html). In contrast, only a handful of medium-high density SNP chips have been designed for noncommercial wild species such as house sparrow (Hagen et al, 2013;Lundregan et al, 2018), great tit (van Bers et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2018), polar bear (Malenfant et al, 2015), flycatcher (Kawakami et al, 2014), fur seal (Humble et al, 2020), Florida scrubjay (Chen et al, 2016) and bald eagle (Judkins et al, 2020). These SNP chips for wild species generate a quantity of genomic data that can be used, for example, to infer relatedness (Humble et al, 2020) and population structure (Hagen et al, 2013;Judkins et al, 2020;Malenfant et al, 2015;Viengkone et al, 2016), analyse the genomic architecture of traits (Duntsch et al, 2020;Husby et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2018;Laine et al, 2019;Lundregan et al, 2018;Santure et al, 2013Santure et al, , 2015Silva et al, 2017), characterise copy number variants in the genome (da Silva et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2018) and investigate the genomic landscape of linkage and linkage disequilibrium (Hagen et al, 2020;Kawakami et al, 2014;van Oers et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%