1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90121-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 5-year study comparing a posterior composite resin and an amalgam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Composite restorations are toothcolored, can be executed in conservative tooth preparation forms, and have shown good performance in controlled clinical trials. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Modern bonding technology has extended the application of composites, reducing microleakage and postoperative sensitivity.12J3 Although the success:failure rate of posterior composites has been well documented, results vary according to the material used and the period e v a l~a t e d .~J~~'~J~ When properly indicated and executed, the annual failure rate of resinbased composite restorations is comparable to the annual failure rate for non-gamma-2 amalgam restorations evaluated for a similar observation period.l6-l8 However, the clinical performance history of amalgam restorations is still superior to that of posterior composite restorations. '8 The purpose of this brief review is to describe, illustrate, and discuss key clinical aspects of the posterior composite technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite restorations are toothcolored, can be executed in conservative tooth preparation forms, and have shown good performance in controlled clinical trials. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Modern bonding technology has extended the application of composites, reducing microleakage and postoperative sensitivity.12J3 Although the success:failure rate of posterior composites has been well documented, results vary according to the material used and the period e v a l~a t e d .~J~~'~J~ When properly indicated and executed, the annual failure rate of resinbased composite restorations is comparable to the annual failure rate for non-gamma-2 amalgam restorations evaluated for a similar observation period.l6-l8 However, the clinical performance history of amalgam restorations is still superior to that of posterior composite restorations. '8 The purpose of this brief review is to describe, illustrate, and discuss key clinical aspects of the posterior composite technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] The following are the three main reasons why restorations are replaced: Clinician factors, material properties, and patient factors. 2,5 The longevity of dental restorations is influenced by several factors, including the restorative materials used, 6-8 the clinician's expertise, 9 patient's age, 9 the type of tooth, 10,11 the tooth's position in the dental arch, [11][12][13] the restoration's design and size, [12][13][14] and the number of restored surfaces. [14][15][16] Burke et al 17 found that normal occlusal function is associated with increased restoration's age at replacement and that excessive and high occlusal function is associated with reduced restoration's age at failure.…”
Section: Patterns Of Restorative Failure Among Khat and Shammah Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with various studies conducted to evaluate restorative failure over the years. 2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Poor framework/ design was reported as the major cause for RPD failure. Technical failures and complications are caused by faults introduced during the manufacturing process, inappropriate design, or simply due to the amount of time the RDP was in function.…”
Section: Jcdpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite reports of good clinical longevity, there are some inherent problems with composite restorations, including polymerization shrinkage and lower wear resistance. [1][2][3][4][5] Polymerization shrinkage appears to be the most significant problem with composite restorations, as it has the potential to initiate gap formation at the tooth-composite interface, 6 which can lead to microleakage, 7 marginal discoloration, 8 secondary caries 9 and eventual failure of the bond. 10 Posterior resin composites can be processed by two methods, 11 either by directly placing the composite in increments, then curing each increment or by indirectly preparing an inlay from the composite, curing it outside the oral cavity and luting it into the cavity with the help of dual cure resin-based cement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%