A 5-year comparison of performance of sentinel and mandatory notification surveillance systems for measles in Switzerland

Abstract

A sensitive, specific and timely surveillance is necessary to monitor progress towards measles elimination. We evaluated the performance of sentinel and mandatory-based surveillance systems for measles in Switzerland during a 5-year period by comparing 145 sentinel and 740 mandatory notified cases. The higher proportion of physicians who reported at least one case per year in the sentinel system suggests underreporting in the recently introduced mandatory surveillance for measles. Accordingly, the latter reported 2-36-fold lower estimates for incidence rates than the sentinel surveillance. However, these estimates were only 0.6-12-fold lower when we considered confirmed cases alone, which indicates a higher specificity of the mandatory surveillance system. In contrast, the sentinel network, which covers 3.5% of all outpatient consultations, detected only weakly and late a major national measles epidemic in 2003 and completely missed 2 of 10 cantonal outbreaks. Despite its better timeliness and greater sensitivity in case detection, the sentinel system, in the current situation of low incidence, is insufficient to perform measles control and to monitor progress towards elimination.

Measles surveillance in Qatar, 2008: quality of surveillance data and timeliness of notification

“…The median time for reporting a suspected measles case was 4 days. This is in agreement with reports from the United States [15], which showed the median time of measles notification to be 4 days (range 1-66 days), and is much better than achieved in Switzerland [16] where a median of 13 days was reported. However, it is still far from the WHO recommendations that at least 80% of suspected cases should be reported within 48 hours.…”

Comparing physicians' reporting propensity with active and passive surveillance systems in South Korea

“…In a study done in the US, the passive reporting system identified only 50% of all cases that were identified by the active system in several metropolitan counties in Tennessee [12]. Richard et al [13] showed that the mandatory surveillance system for measles reported 2-to 36-fold lower estimates for incidence rates than the sentinel surveillance in Switzerland.…”

Evaluation of Mandatory Case-based Reporting System for Varicella in the Prevaccine Era

“…These systems have higher specificity and better timeliness then mandatory surveillance systems, but they are less sensitive for detecting outbreaks of less common diseases (22). Paediatric sentinel surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases in Italy showed that the national estimates are 3 to 7 times higher than those obtained through statutory notifications (5).…”