1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(64)80152-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 5 year clinical evaluation of a therapeutic program for patients with cystic fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
1
10

Year Published

1966
1966
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
67
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the measure of disease severity in this study was limited to only one measure of lung function, FEV1%pred., which measures the individual's expiratory volume as a percentage of the expected volume for their age and height. By contrast, Chace et al (1983) used a more comprehensive measure, scoring patients on a clinical scale of 0-100 that covered many aspects of health (Doershuk et al, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the measure of disease severity in this study was limited to only one measure of lung function, FEV1%pred., which measures the individual's expiratory volume as a percentage of the expected volume for their age and height. By contrast, Chace et al (1983) used a more comprehensive measure, scoring patients on a clinical scale of 0-100 that covered many aspects of health (Doershuk et al, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gravidade da doença fibrocística também foi considerada utilizando-se o escore de Shwachman (ES) modificado por Doershuk 15 . O ES aborda itens relacionados à atividade geral, exame físico, nutrição e achados radiológicos, apresentando uma escala de 20 a 100 pontos.…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…Os pacientes foram classificados como: graves (pontuação menor que 40), moderados (entre 40 e 55), médios (de 56 a 70), bons (entre 71 e 85) e excelentes (de 86 a 100 pontos). Para análise dos dados, a amostra foi dividida em dois grupos: o grupo de menor gravidade (pacientes classificados como bons e excelentes pelo ES) e o grupo de maior gravidade (classificados como graves, moderados e médios) 15 , sendo considerada dicotomizada para a análise dos dados.…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…The Shwachman-Kulczycki system was modified by Doershuk et al (36) to enhance its detail. This system awards 25 points in each of four categories: interval symptomatic history, pulmonary physical findings and the nature of the CF patient's cough, growth pattern, and the chest roentgenogram appearance.…”
Section: Patients' Age In Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A physician unaware of the CF patients' serum mucin-associated antigen measurements retrospectivly reviewed the charts and chest roentgenograms of the 20 patients in the CF serial sample group. For each outpatient visit when a serum specimen was obtained, the physician assigned each patient a Shwachman-Kulczycki clinical score (as modified by Doershuk, et al (36) and a Brasfield chest roentgenogram score (37). Mucin assay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%