2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1710.11529
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 4D-Var Method with Flow-Dependent Background Covariances for the Shallow-Water Equations

Abstract: The 4D-Var method for filtering partially observed nonlinear chaotic dynamical systems consists of finding the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) estimator of the initial condition of the system given observations over a time window, and propagating it forward to the current time via the model dynamics. This method forms the basis of most currently operational weather forecasting systems. In practice the optimization becomes infeasible if the time window is too long due to the non-convexity of the cost function, the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we have found in simulations on Figure 2 that even for relatively large values of σ Z and h, for large dimensions, and not very short assimilation windows, these approximations seem to be working reasonably well. Besides theoretical importance, the Gaussian approximation of the smoother can be also used to construct the prior (background) distributions for the subsequent intervals in a flow-dependent way, as we have shown in Paulin et al [2017] for the non-linear shallow-water equations, even for realistic values of σ Z and h. These flow-dependent prior distributions can considerably improve filtering accuracy. Going beyond the approximately Gaussian case (for example when σ Z , h, and T are large, or the system is highly non-linear) in a computationally efficient way is a challenging problem for future research (see Bocquet, Pires, and Wu [2010] for some examples where this situation arises).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we have found in simulations on Figure 2 that even for relatively large values of σ Z and h, for large dimensions, and not very short assimilation windows, these approximations seem to be working reasonably well. Besides theoretical importance, the Gaussian approximation of the smoother can be also used to construct the prior (background) distributions for the subsequent intervals in a flow-dependent way, as we have shown in Paulin et al [2017] for the non-linear shallow-water equations, even for realistic values of σ Z and h. These flow-dependent prior distributions can considerably improve filtering accuracy. Going beyond the approximately Gaussian case (for example when σ Z , h, and T are large, or the system is highly non-linear) in a computationally efficient way is a challenging problem for future research (see Bocquet, Pires, and Wu [2010] for some examples where this situation arises).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we have computed the Newton's method iterations described in (2.28) based on preconditioned conjugate gradient solver, with the gradient and the product of the Hessian with a vector were evaluated based on adjoint methods as described by equations (3.5)-(3.7) and Section 3.2.1 of Paulin, Jasra, Beskos, and Crisan [2017] (see also Le Dimet, Navon, and Daescu [2002]). This means that the Hessians were approximated using products of Jacobian matrices that were stored in sparse format due to the local dependency of the equations (3.1).…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SWE we consider both complete observations with all model variables observed (p = 100%) or sparse observations with every 100th variable observed (p = 1%). We additionally consider three basic observation scenarios for experiments (see [56]):…”
Section: Shallow Water Equations (Swe) 531 Model Simulation and Param...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the projection matrices computed, we assimilate using Proj-OP-PF starting at t = 48h and continuing for the next 24h, with observations performed and assimilated with the timestep of τ D = 60min (as compared to a one minute observational time scale in [56]). This effectively discards the first day as transient between the initial condition and the development of the coherent structures.…”
Section: Shallow Water Equations (Swe) 531 Model Simulation and Param...mentioning
confidence: 99%