“…This can be explained by the higher degree of rotational and steric freedom for the subunit of cluster 4 a, which is bridged via μ 2 -iodido ligands, compared to the subunit in compound 3, where the bridging cyclopentadienyl ligands exert a high steric strain on the two subunits. Likewise, the distances between the apical cerium centers in complex 4 a and the μ 2 -bridging iodido Whereas donor-free lanthanide clusters usually show spherical arrange-ments, [34,35,[42][43][44] ring structural motifs are more common for lanthanide clusters bridged via donor ligands like, e. g., {Gd 140 } or {Yb 42 }, [6,20,45,46] or smaller sandwich-type ringcluster hybrids such as, e. g., [(C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Sm(μ 2 -Cl)] 3 . [36,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] In sandwich-type ring structures, the metal centers display a more or less planar arrangement, while the deviation from planarity naturally increases with the steric demand of the ligand system or ligand complexity.…”