2016
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 4-miRNA signature predicts the therapeutic outcome of glioblastoma

Abstract: Multimodal therapy of glioblastoma (GBM) reveals inter-individual variability in terms of treatment outcome. Here, we examined whether a miRNA signature can be defined for the a priori identification of patients with particularly poor prognosis.FFPE sections from 36 GBM patients along with overall survival follow-up were collected retrospectively and subjected to miRNA signature identification from microarray data. A risk score based on the expression of the signature miRNAs and cox-proportional hazard coeffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently built an miRNA signature predicting outcome in glioblastoma using the same approach (Supplementary Methods; ref. 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently built an miRNA signature predicting outcome in glioblastoma using the same approach (Supplementary Methods; ref. 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the present study, we constructed a statistical model containing multiple glycolysis-related genes and combined the function of each gene to improve the prediction e ciency. This kind of model has been con rmed in many other solid tumours and is superior to a single biomarker in predicting tumour prognosis [24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, a gene signature comprising various genes has been built from the statistical model to predict cancer outcomes. The results highlight that the predictive effects of each gene involved can offer a more accurate prediction than a single biomarker [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%