2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10134542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 4-DOF Workspace Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot: Mechanism Design, Human Joint Analysis and Trajectory Planning

Abstract: Most of currently rehabilitation robots cannot achieve the adduction/abduction (A/A) training of the hip joint and lack the consideration of the patient handling. This paper presents a four degrees of freedom (DOF) spatial workspace lower limb rehabilitation robot, and it could provide flexion/extension (F/E) training to three lower limb joints and A/A training to the hip joint. The training method is conducting the patient’s foot to complete the rehabilitation movement, and the patient could directly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can perform rehabilitation training in dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and varus/valgus directions, calibrate the control accuracy of the kinematic model and derive the inverse solution of the position [29].Wang H. proposed a four-degree-of-freedom lower limb rehabilitation robot, which analyzed the human-machine hybrid kinematics model according to the Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) method, and explored the user-based variable human-machine workspace. The trajectory tracking experiment of the prototype verifies the trajectory planning method and the human body joint analysis method [30].Based on the theory of generalized function set, Zhang J. reveals the relationship between the motion characteristics of a rigid body and a point on the rigid body. It is determined that the robot body can realize the motion characteristics of the six-dimensional ankle [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It can perform rehabilitation training in dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and varus/valgus directions, calibrate the control accuracy of the kinematic model and derive the inverse solution of the position [29].Wang H. proposed a four-degree-of-freedom lower limb rehabilitation robot, which analyzed the human-machine hybrid kinematics model according to the Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) method, and explored the user-based variable human-machine workspace. The trajectory tracking experiment of the prototype verifies the trajectory planning method and the human body joint analysis method [30].Based on the theory of generalized function set, Zhang J. reveals the relationship between the motion characteristics of a rigid body and a point on the rigid body. It is determined that the robot body can realize the motion characteristics of the six-dimensional ankle [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…At present, D-H parameter method is commonly used in manipulator calibration to establish kinematics model because its method is simple and easy to use. e D-H parameter method is used to establish the kinematic model in reference [27][28][29][30], but the D-H parameter method has a defect that cannot be ignored, that is, its motion can only revolve around the x-axis and z-axis, but cannot express the motion about the y-axis [26], which makes the singularity problem when the two continuous joints are parallel or nearly parallel, and the calculation process of the kinematic model of the manipulator with multidegree of freedom is complex and inefficient. In view of the shortcomings of the D-H parameter method, the MDH method has good kinematic characteristics and can find the forward and inverse solutions of the kinematic model [13,[31][32][33], but the singularity problem is still a great challenge.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these reported robots operate in a two-dimensional (2D) environment [ 13 ]. In contrast, others operate in a three-dimensional (3D) environment with 3 Degrees of Freedom (DOF) [ 14 ], 4 DOF [ 15 ], 5 DOF [ 9 , 16 ], 6 DOF [ 12 ], and a few even reached 7 DOF or more [ 17 ]. Some research teams have focused on developing algorithms for using dedicated commercial robots in the industrial domain [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%