2010
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2010.2077350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 4.5 mW/Gb/s 6.4 Gb/s 22+1-Lane Source Synchronous Receiver Core With Optional Cleanup PLL in 65 nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the background CDR mode is activated in step 4 for continuous tracking of bit and byte alignment. Then, the local CDRs are turned off for most of the time to reduce power consumption and periodically turned on to track phase drift due to voltage and temperature variations, which is similar to the concept of the pulsed CDR [7]. Fig.…”
Section: B Rxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the background CDR mode is activated in step 4 for continuous tracking of bit and byte alignment. Then, the local CDRs are turned off for most of the time to reduce power consumption and periodically turned on to track phase drift due to voltage and temperature variations, which is similar to the concept of the pulsed CDR [7]. Fig.…”
Section: B Rxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link was specifically designed for this type of application and consists of 15 or 22 differential data lanes and 1 clock lane. The interface is designed as a source-synchronous link, which means that the bus clock and data are driven from the same source clock in the driving chip and the bus clock is used to latch the data in the receiving chip [11].…”
Section: Differential Memory Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ultra-high speed input signal of 100 Gbps or more, the synchronization signal still has large jitter and signal transmission and also has large latency. In the circuit design, when there is a latency difference between the clock and data path, the correlation of the clock to data sampling is weakened [2], resulting in an increase in the correlation jitter between the clock and data path, which reduces the jitter tolerance. Therefore, many studies have minimized the delay matching between clock and data through clock sampling and forwarding techniques, which in turn achieves noise filtering and jitter cancellation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many studies have minimized the delay matching between clock and data through clock sampling and forwarding techniques, which in turn achieves noise filtering and jitter cancellation. In [2], the receiver-side clock path uses a high-bandwidth filtered PLL to track data-related jitter and to cut off high-frequency jitter, but this method does not guarantee that the PLL output clock and data path are at the same frequency; the literature [3] uses a multiplying delay-locked loop (MDLL) to reset the oscillator jitter at the rate of the reference clock frequency, which does not require a high bandwidth loop to the suppress oscillator jitter, reducing the complexity of the design, but this can subject the MDLL to large duty cycle distortion. A region-efficient phase filtering technique is proposed in [4] to filter the jitter between cascaded repeaters, but the noise environment is not fundamentally eliminated, and the jitter accumulated by subsequent cascaded circuits degrades the system performance and jitter tolerance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%