2021
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-viii-m-1-2021-133-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3d Point Cloud Deep Learning Approach Using Lidar to Identify Ancient Maya Archaeological Sites

Abstract: Abstract. Airborne light detection and ranging (LIDAR) systems allow archaeologists to capture 3D data of anthropogenic landscapes with a level of precision that permits the identification of archaeological sites in difficult to reach and inaccessible regions. These benefits have come with a deluge of LIDAR data that requires significant and costly manual labor to interpret and analyze. In order to address this challenge, researchers have explored the use of state-of-the-art automated object recognition algori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only verified training data should be used in machine and deep learning models to maximize their effectiveness, especially given that archaeological datasets fall well short of the millions of examples that would ideally be provided for training (Somrak et al, 2020: 8). New DL-models are being published rapidly, including point cloud-based classifications (e.g., Richards-Rissetto et al, 2021), and hold the greatest promise for interpreting large datasets and making broader comparisons, by eliminating inter-analyst bias while simultaneously being able to rapidly classifying thousands of square kilometers of data.…”
Section: Assessing Lidar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only verified training data should be used in machine and deep learning models to maximize their effectiveness, especially given that archaeological datasets fall well short of the millions of examples that would ideally be provided for training (Somrak et al, 2020: 8). New DL-models are being published rapidly, including point cloud-based classifications (e.g., Richards-Rissetto et al, 2021), and hold the greatest promise for interpreting large datasets and making broader comparisons, by eliminating inter-analyst bias while simultaneously being able to rapidly classifying thousands of square kilometers of data.…”
Section: Assessing Lidar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential to understand from the ground what the features in the remotely sensed data are to avoid misinterpretation that can lead to incorrect conclusions. After enough features of interest have been correctly identified in the data, however, machine learning algorithms promise to facilitate and accelerate our mapping efforts across the broader region (Bundzel et al, 2020; Character et al, 2021, Character et al, in review; Richards et al, 2021; Talukdar et al, 2020). Here, after we have determined the remotely sensed data most useful for identifying the ancient canals, we test a machine learning algorithm for efficiently mapping the networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples of extensive canal features include Stoner et al (2021) who compared large expanses of canal systems with settlement patterns in the tropical lowlands of Veracruz; Inomata et al (2021) in Tabasco, Mexico, Dunning et al in Campeche (2020), and Šprajc et al (2021) in Campeche, Mexico. Several studies have developed and compared various ways to process and visualize LiDAR DEMs for identifying ancient structures and mounds (Bundzel et al, 2020; Inomata et al, 2017; Kokalj and Somrak, 2019; Richards et al, 2021; Thompson, 2020), but no other peer-reviewed sources have applied these techniques for identifying the ancient canals. Here we compare the same processing and visualization techniques commonly used in urban archaeology for canal and raised field identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%