2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-07819-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D nodule candidate detection method supported by hybrid features to reduce false positives in lung nodule detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiomic texture features have been widely used in tissue characterization for discriminating different types of lesions in thoracic CT images, such as automatic lung nodule detection [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lung nodules [15,16], and differentiation of lung cancer subtypes [17]. Several texture features have been suggested for automated detection of pulmonary nodules in CT images, including the mean, skewness, and kurtosis values of intensity histograms [28][29][30][31][32][33], local binary patterns [9,14,34,35], and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based features [28][29][30]36]. While radiomic texture features were shown to be effective in distinguishing various types of lung nodules, discrimination between SPCH and LPA was intrinsically di cult due to their common GGN-like appearance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomic texture features have been widely used in tissue characterization for discriminating different types of lesions in thoracic CT images, such as automatic lung nodule detection [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lung nodules [15,16], and differentiation of lung cancer subtypes [17]. Several texture features have been suggested for automated detection of pulmonary nodules in CT images, including the mean, skewness, and kurtosis values of intensity histograms [28][29][30][31][32][33], local binary patterns [9,14,34,35], and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based features [28][29][30]36]. While radiomic texture features were shown to be effective in distinguishing various types of lung nodules, discrimination between SPCH and LPA was intrinsically di cult due to their common GGN-like appearance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[166][167][168] showed algorithms that achieved better results that year. The deep learning methods [71,[169][170][171][172] for lung nodule detection did not show promising results.…”
Section: Lidc-idrimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Generally, thresholding, component analysis, region growing, morphological operations, and filtering [19], [22], [26], [51]- [52], [62], [67]- [68], [96], [109] are often used as rule-based approaches in preprocessing medical images. Thresholding and component analysis are the most effective and quick ways to approximately separate lung volume from distracting components.…”
Section: A Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these classical image processing methods are developed according to pixel intensity and lowlevel representatives of images. Additional filtering or geometric features computing methods are also needed to optimize candidate nodule generation [22], [74].…”
Section: ) Candidate Nodule Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%