A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping

Abstract

Cell 159, 1665Cell 159, -1680 December 11, 2014) Our paper analyzed the three-dimensional (3D) architecture of genomes at high resolution in nine human and murine cell lines. One of our main conclusions was that the vast majority of loops are anchored at CTCF/cohesin-binding sites whose motifs are oriented in a convergent fashion, i.e., the motifs point at one another. We arrived at this conclusion by analyzing peaks where the two corresponding peak loci each contained a single CTCF-binding motif. We performed this analysis in eight different cell lines.It has come to our attention that, in this analysis, we inadvertently used the wrong peak file for one of the eight cell lines (GM12878). In addition to peaks in which there was a unique motif at each of the two peak loci, this file, which had been generated by a preliminary version of our code, included peaks whenever there was (1) a unique motif at one peak locus and (2) a unique motif on the opposite strand at the other peak locus. We have now redone the analysis using the correct file. As a result, we found that several numbers on page 1675 of the main text and page S73 of the Extended Experimental Procedures, as well as Figure 6D, need to be adjusted as shown below. The correct list of motifs associated with each loop anchor, together with their orientations, has been uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) at the original accession number for the paper, GEO: GSE63525.These corrections do not affect the numbers for the other seven cell lines and do not modify the conclusions of the paper in any way.The main text corrections from page 1675 are shown below, with the correct numbers underlined and the original text numbers in brackets.''If CTCF sites were randomly oriented, one would expect all four orientations to occur equally often. But when we examined the 2,857 [4,322] peaks in GM12878 where the two corresponding peak loci each contained a single CTCF-binding motif, we found that the vast majority (90% [92%]) of motif pairs are convergent ( Figures 6D and 6E). Overall, the presence, at pairs of peak loci, of bound CTCF sites in the convergent orientation was enriched 102-fold over random expectation (Extended Experimental Procedures). The convergent orientation was overwhelmingly more frequent than the divergent orientation, despite the fact that divergent motifs also lie on opposing strands: in GM12878, the counts were 2,574-10 [3,971-78] (257-fold [51-fold] enrichment, convergent versus divergent); in IMR90, 1, in HMEC,; in K562, 723-2 (362-fold); in HUVEC, 671-4 (168-fold); in HeLa, 301-3 (100-fold); in NHEK, 556-9 (62-fold); and in CH12-LX, 625-8 (78-fold). This pattern suggests that a pair of CTCF sites in the convergent orientation is required for the formation of a loop.The observation that looped CTCF sites occur in the convergent orientation also allows us to analyze peak loci containing multiple CTCF-bound motifs to predict which motif instance plays a role in a given loop. In this way, we can associate nearly two-thirds of peak loci (8...

Single-cell Hi-C for genome-wide detection of chromatin interactions that occur simultaneously in a single cell

“…Despite these technical differences, we confirmed that the single-cell Hi-C protocol produces data similar to conventional ensemble Hi-C by comparing pooled single-cell Hi-C data from multiple cells 13 . Our more recent analyses, and those of others, suggest that in-nucleus ligation actually improves Hi-C results 14,15 .…”

Extruding Loops to Make Loopy Globules?

“…), in the case of a genome, the volume interactions between various pieces of chromatin fiber are mediated by a variety of chromatin-related proteins some of which may bind more or less specifically to certain sequence motifs. An important hint in this direction came from a high resolution Hi-C study (8), where~10 4 pair contacts were identified as loop anchors, and their sequence motifs were found to be antiparallel, oriented along the genome such as to face one another. Now, in hindsight, these motifs are beautifully interpreted as natural stop signs for the loop extruding proteins (5,6).…”

Oncometabolite Tinkers with Genome Folding, Boosting Oncogene Expression

“…A recent paper [2] adds a new twist to the story by demonstrating that IDH mutations affect the binding of the chromatin organiser protein CTCF, which demarcates domains of genome folding [3]. To illustrate the relationship between 3D chromatin domains and CTCF binding, Figure 1 shows high-resolution Hi-C data ( Figure 1A) and CTCF ChIPsequencing data ( Figure 1B) for the genomic region home to the known glioma oncogene, PDGFRA.…”

“…The PDGFRA promoter is adjacent to CTCF sites in reverse orientation (green in Figure 1C). Illustrating an emerging principle of genome folding [3], 2 these reverse sites interact with CTCF motifs in convergent (forward) orientation to form a 'loop domain', visible in Hi-C data as a triangle connecting the CTCF sites ( Figure 1A). …”

“…The drug 5-azacytidine partially restores CTCF binding and downregulates PDGFRA expression in IDH mutant cells [3]. Mechanistically, 5-azacytidine reduces DNA methylation by inhibiting the methyl transferase DNMT1, but has additional effects on chromatin and gene regulation [8].…”