2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D forming tool optimisation method considering springback and thinning compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we present a numerical method for the compensation of springback, thinning, and blank edge geometry which results in the simultaneous optimization of the blank shape and forming tool geometry. Based on our previous works, the proposed iterative procedure is developed by integrating the springback (and thinning) compensation algorithm [35,36] and the blank edge geometry correction algorithm [52] into one unified algorithm. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study has yet comprehensively considered all these phenomena; this thus represents the main novelty of this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we present a numerical method for the compensation of springback, thinning, and blank edge geometry which results in the simultaneous optimization of the blank shape and forming tool geometry. Based on our previous works, the proposed iterative procedure is developed by integrating the springback (and thinning) compensation algorithm [35,36] and the blank edge geometry correction algorithm [52] into one unified algorithm. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study has yet comprehensively considered all these phenomena; this thus represents the main novelty of this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, when dealing with 3D springback compensation, an appropriate correspondence between the product and the tool topologies must be established. In our previous works [35,36], this was achieved through improved normal description-surface description is improved to achieve C 1 continuity when a rectangular surface mesh is used. Moreover, besides springback compensation, the product's wall thickness is also optimized by taking into account that the inner and the outer side of the product interact with the adjusted tool (see also Bici et al [37]).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we propose a new method of compensating for the injection moulded part warpage that aims to overcome the challenges mentioned above. The basis of the method is the Enhanced Displacement Adjustment (E-DA) method, developed by Cafuta and Mole [3,22,23,30] for use in sheet metal forming. Similar to injection moulding, where distortion of the shape manifests as warpage, the geometric accuracy in metal forming is hampered by springback and the thinning of the formed sheet metal part.…”
Section: Mould Cavity Geometry Correction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For virtual fit analysis done previously, the deviation analysis tool in CATIA V5R21™ (Dassault Systemes, Velizy, FR) was frequently applied 9,11 in ergonomics design. Also, it is widely applied in product design optimisation 26 , additive manufacturing (AM) artifacts, and accuracy comparison 27 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%