2009
DOI: 10.5585/exacta.v6i1.796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D contact investigation of rough surfaces considering elastoplasticity

Abstract: In this work, the non-penetration condition and the interface models for contact, taking into account the surface microstructure, are investigated in detail. It is done using a homogenization procedures presented by Bandeira, Wriggers and Pimenta (2001a), to obtain by numerical simulation the interface behavior for the normal and tangential contact pressures, based on statistical surface models. The contact surfaces of both bodies are rough. This paper can be regarded as a complementary study to that presented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jamari and Schipper 11 and Jamari et al 12 presented a process wherein the shape of the roughness is determined by transforming it by one with a paraboloid shape. Another way to represent the roughness is by means of the Bezier curves applied over the surface measurements, as shown in the works of Bandeira et al 13 and Bedolla et al 14 In recent studies, such as Persson, 15 Goedecke and Mock, 16 Mu¨ser, 17 and Wriggers and Nettingsmeier, 18 it has been proposed that periodic functions, such as sine or exponential, have better correspondence with surface topography, whose replication models consider both amplitude and length of roughness. These models replicate surfaces at multiple scales, in a continuous way and proportional to a fractal parameter with a Gaussian distribution of asperities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jamari and Schipper 11 and Jamari et al 12 presented a process wherein the shape of the roughness is determined by transforming it by one with a paraboloid shape. Another way to represent the roughness is by means of the Bezier curves applied over the surface measurements, as shown in the works of Bandeira et al 13 and Bedolla et al 14 In recent studies, such as Persson, 15 Goedecke and Mock, 16 Mu¨ser, 17 and Wriggers and Nettingsmeier, 18 it has been proposed that periodic functions, such as sine or exponential, have better correspondence with surface topography, whose replication models consider both amplitude and length of roughness. These models replicate surfaces at multiple scales, in a continuous way and proportional to a fractal parameter with a Gaussian distribution of asperities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%