2013
DOI: 10.1021/ie302028s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D CFD-DEM Methodology for Simulating Industrial Scale Packed Bed Chemical Looping Combustion Reactors

Abstract: Design of industrial scale packed bed reactors can be aided by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-discrete element method (DEM) simulation for understanding the transport phenomena. However, conducting CFD-DEM simulation for the whole large-scale packed bed reactor is computationally prohibitive, which limits the usage of this tool. Hence, a methodology has been developed to identify the segments of the bed, which can serve as a good representative for the CFD simulation of large industrial scale packed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beds of the PBR where prepared using the distinct element method (DEM) which simulates realistic packing of the PBR (de Moura Teixeira, 2013; Eppinger et al, 2011;Kuroki et al, 2009;Tabib et al, 2013;Tsory et al, 2013;Vollmari et al, 2015;Wehinger et al, 2015;Zobel et al, 2012). The simulations were conducted with Blender (Blender Foundation), which is often used in scientific studies (Boccardo et al, 2015;Icardi et al, 2014;Pavlišič et al, 2018;van Gumster, 2015).…”
Section: Packingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beds of the PBR where prepared using the distinct element method (DEM) which simulates realistic packing of the PBR (de Moura Teixeira, 2013; Eppinger et al, 2011;Kuroki et al, 2009;Tabib et al, 2013;Tsory et al, 2013;Vollmari et al, 2015;Wehinger et al, 2015;Zobel et al, 2012). The simulations were conducted with Blender (Blender Foundation), which is often used in scientific studies (Boccardo et al, 2015;Icardi et al, 2014;Pavlišič et al, 2018;van Gumster, 2015).…”
Section: Packingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, meshing the whole reactor would require an excessive number of computational cells, resulting in impractically long computational times. Previous studies have shown that it suffices to find a representative cut-segment of the bed (D cut /d p > 4 for arbitrary particles) (Tabib et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the description of the fluid dynamics of the reactor, two categories of models can be identified [8]: macroscopic fluid dynamics models (MFD) [9][10][11][12][13] and computational fluid dynamics models (CFD). Based on the description to the particle phase dynamics, the CFD models can also be divided into three categories: the two-fluid model, the CFD-DEM (discrete element method) model [14,15], and the CPFD (computational particle fluid dynamics) model [16,17]. In CFD simulation based on the Navier-Stokes equation for describing the fluid flow, less artificial factors existed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, normally time and volume average conservation equations are solved for each phase separately . The second method is suitable for multiphase systems, including a disperse or particulate phase, in which a continuum method is applied to the continuous phases and a particle tracking method to the discrete phase . In our previous works,, we developed an Eulerian‐Lagrangian method to model trickle bed reactors, including three phases of gas‐liquid‐solid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%