“…First, we examined the printability of various bioinks using our well‐established macro (bulk)‐ and micro (strand)‐ level fidelity measurement protocols ( Figure 3 , Table 2 ). [ 31,32,67 ] The bulk fidelity measurements of ATES diameter ( d ) showed r d,bulk ratios 78 ± 1%, 92 ± 1%, 87 ± 1%, 88 ± 1%, and 93 ± 1% for HAMA, GelMA, HAMA/GelMA, HAMA‐Dopa/GelMA (embedded printed), and HAMA‐Dopa/GelMA (air printed) groups, respectively (Figure 3A,B, Table 2). Further, the perimeter of disc‐shape constructs was measured to calculate r P,bulk ratios of 81 ± 1%, 96 ± 1%, 91% ±1%, 95 ± 2%, and 102 ± 1% for HAMA, GelMA, HAMA/GelMA, HAMA‐Dopa/GelMA (embedded printed), and HAMA‐Dopa/GelMA (air printed) groups, respectively (Figure 3A,B, Table 2).…”