2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icuas54217.2022.9836190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D Benchmark for UAV Path Planning Algorithms: Missions Complexity, Evaluation and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related research in the field of drone operations and data acquisition for photogrammetric processes includes benchmark data that are openly accessible, which allows easy comparisons of results (Rocha and Vivaldini, 2022). This could be another worthwhile addition to the literature on the topic of scan planning and the VPP for static laser scanning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related research in the field of drone operations and data acquisition for photogrammetric processes includes benchmark data that are openly accessible, which allows easy comparisons of results (Rocha and Vivaldini, 2022). This could be another worthwhile addition to the literature on the topic of scan planning and the VPP for static laser scanning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a comprehensive complexity formula has been developed, incorporating several factors, including the size of the environment, the number of obstacles that the drone identiőed until the moment, the distance to the goal node, and the spatial distribution factor (SDF), as shown in Equation 8. This equation is based in the results of this study [55], which describes the complexity of several path planning algorithms. complexity = ( num_obstacles grid_size 2 )×(…”
Section: Dynamic Iterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All used algorithms were optimized by adjusting the hyperparameters as shown in a previous work [Rocha and Vivaldini 2022] and using them correctly with the other UAV modules, except for APF, which was implemented to improve the algorithm that differs from the conceptual model. Three improvements were implemented in APF.…”
Section: Path Planning Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several path planning techniques and each of them has different results in different environments [Rocha and Vivaldini 2022]. The path planning techniques to be evaluated fall into three main categories: classical techniques (exact and approximate), metaheuristic, and machine learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%