2020
DOI: 10.1257/jep.34.4.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 30-Year Perspective on Property Derivatives: What Can Be Done to Tame Property Price Risk?

Abstract: The housing sector is the largest spot market in the world without a developed derivative contract to serve the risk management needs of market participants. This paper describes the evolution within a wider economic context of property derivatives in the United States and worldwide. We review various economic arguments presented in the literature to highlight the advantages of these financial instruments to society. The paper also provides a critical perspective on the principal obstacles hindering the develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the life-cycle trend in LTV, lenders would have to price in a forward-looking path of collateral, and implicitly bear the risk of future house price developments over the fixation horizon of the longer-term contract, in order to make the longer-term contract attractive to high-LTV borrowers. The findings are consistent with lenders requiring compensation for a systematic source of risk, and the lack of financial instruments available to hedge aggregate house price risk, as observed by Shiller (2014) and Fabozzi et al (2020). The findings also provide a general intuition for why the initial insurance benchmark does not hold, as long-term contracts in markets with systematic risks may command a premium above the expected cost of the short-term contract sequence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the life-cycle trend in LTV, lenders would have to price in a forward-looking path of collateral, and implicitly bear the risk of future house price developments over the fixation horizon of the longer-term contract, in order to make the longer-term contract attractive to high-LTV borrowers. The findings are consistent with lenders requiring compensation for a systematic source of risk, and the lack of financial instruments available to hedge aggregate house price risk, as observed by Shiller (2014) and Fabozzi et al (2020). The findings also provide a general intuition for why the initial insurance benchmark does not hold, as long-term contracts in markets with systematic risks may command a premium above the expected cost of the short-term contract sequence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The fact that longer-term contracts are relatively more costly at high levels of LTV may be consistent with the lack of financial instruments available to hedge house price risk as observed by Shiller (2014) and Fabozzi et al (2020), and lenders requiring compensation for exposure to house price risk as a systematic source of risk.…”
Section: Discussion Of Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Similarly, home prices have shown record price appreciation [20]. Recent research considers home prices and related derivatives in the context of noise trader risk (Fabozzi et al , 2020; Uluc, 2018). Considering cryptocurrency, Liu and Tsyvinski (2020) consider momentum in the context of noise traders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Akerlof and Shiller, 2009 , Benford et al, 2018 , Boxell and Shapiro, 2017 , Fabozzi et al, 2020 , Grey, 2020 , Hall and Kudlyak, 2019 , Hall, 2021 , Kahn, 1931 , Kermack and McKendrick, 1927 , Marshall, 1920 , Shiller, 2019 , Shiller, 2003 , Shiller, 2020 , Sunstein, 2017 )…”
Section: Uncited Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%