2013
DOI: 10.3233/ppr-130023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3-month prospective study of injuries in amateur rugby and soccer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this is considered to be high in comparison to some sports, such as soccer and basketball, it is comparable with other collision sports, such as ice hockey, Australian Rules football and American football [ 8 11 ]. The incidence of injury in the amateur rugby game has been widely reported in various studies, ranging from 5.95/1000 player hours to 99.5/1000 player hours; however, inconsistencies in the methods of data collection and injury definitions used, make interstudy comparisons challenging [ 12 , 13 ]. While it has been found that injury surveillance in amateur cohorts is more difficult than in professional cohorts owing to the lack of resources and the infrequent contact between medical professionals and amateur teams, consistent injury definitions and methods of data collection may provide much needed epidemiological information [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this is considered to be high in comparison to some sports, such as soccer and basketball, it is comparable with other collision sports, such as ice hockey, Australian Rules football and American football [ 8 11 ]. The incidence of injury in the amateur rugby game has been widely reported in various studies, ranging from 5.95/1000 player hours to 99.5/1000 player hours; however, inconsistencies in the methods of data collection and injury definitions used, make interstudy comparisons challenging [ 12 , 13 ]. While it has been found that injury surveillance in amateur cohorts is more difficult than in professional cohorts owing to the lack of resources and the infrequent contact between medical professionals and amateur teams, consistent injury definitions and methods of data collection may provide much needed epidemiological information [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to effectively minimize injury in sport, as outlined by the Translating Research into Injury Prevention Practice (TRIPP) Model, a full understanding of the incidence and etiology of injuries is required [ 17 ]. While many studies have aimed to establish the incidence of injury in rugby, the varying methods, injury definitions and length of follow-up make comparisons difficult [ 12 , 18 , 19 ]. By pooling data from several studies using comparable methodologies, overall estimates of injury incidence can be produced that more accurately reflect the injury incidence rate present among the amateur population [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main characteristics of the 24 studies that met inclusion are presented in Table 1. Based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale NOS, most studies were of moderate quality (n = 13, 54%) [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Ten articles were of strong quality (40%) [1,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], and one study was defined as weak quality (6%) [46].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 24 studies that met inclusion comprised of 2866 participants, male players were involved in 21 studies [1,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]47], one study involved female players [26], and two studies included both males and females [46,48]. Eleven articles were conducted with professional players [1, 27, 33, 36-39, 41, 43-45], ten with amateur players [26, 28-32, 34, 42, 46-49], two with semi-professional players [40,42], and not enough information about the level of competition was available in one study [35].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation