1995
DOI: 10.1016/0924-7963(95)00021-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2D long term advection—dispersion model for the Channel and southern North Sea Part B: Transit time and transfer function from Cap de La Hague

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transit time from La Hague to Dover is 75 days for a conservative radionuclide. This value compares with previous calculations of about 3 months [4]. Using the general theory of the age, Delhez and Deleersnijder [2] obtained a value of about 4 months.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The transit time from La Hague to Dover is 75 days for a conservative radionuclide. This value compares with previous calculations of about 3 months [4]. Using the general theory of the age, Delhez and Deleersnijder [2] obtained a value of about 4 months.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The transit time of the radionuclide patch from the source to a given point is defined as well. It is determined from the cross-correlation function of the time-series of radionuclide concentrations at the source and the point of interest [4]. Some characteristic times have also been defined for the bed sediments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R m (t) is assumed to be proportional to a lagged moving average, chosen to smooth the noise in discharges. They also used an alternative, theoretical weighting, derived from a model described by Salomon et al (1995). Similarly Masson et al (1995) used a three-point moving average, and attempted to remove seasonal effects by de-trending the time series of observations.…”
Section: Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained with the 125 Sb and a model of residual currents during previous work have overall agreed clearly with the calculated and measured results. The average distribution of the radionuclides measured and observed has been reproduced at the scale of the Channel and the North Sea [4] [5] [6]. However, a significant discrepancy has appeared between the assessments of calculated and measured radionuclides and in the spatial spread of the plumes marked at a given date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%