2021 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-Sscc) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/a-sscc53895.2021.9634787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 28.2 μC Neuromorphic Sensing System Featuring SNN-based Near-sensor Computation and Event-Driven Body-Channel Communication for Insertable Cardiac Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table I the presented impulse-based galvanic coupled BCC is benchmarked with stateof-the-art high-speed (>200 Mbps) and miniature implantable transmitters (Tx), including inductive coupling, optical and Impulse-radio UWB (IR-UWB). The proposed GC-BCC demonstrates a data rate up to 250 Mbps with a small electronic area of 26 mm 2 , while most state-of-the-art GC-BCC communication [34], [35], [49] has limited bandwidth up to 10's MHz. Inductive coupled communication can achieve a higher data rate with a "de-Q" technique [23], but it suffers from high path loss and still requires a relatively large coil area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table I the presented impulse-based galvanic coupled BCC is benchmarked with stateof-the-art high-speed (>200 Mbps) and miniature implantable transmitters (Tx), including inductive coupling, optical and Impulse-radio UWB (IR-UWB). The proposed GC-BCC demonstrates a data rate up to 250 Mbps with a small electronic area of 26 mm 2 , while most state-of-the-art GC-BCC communication [34], [35], [49] has limited bandwidth up to 10's MHz. Inductive coupled communication can achieve a higher data rate with a "de-Q" technique [23], but it suffers from high path loss and still requires a relatively large coil area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galvanic-coupled body channel communications (GC-BCCs) reported in the literature focus primarily on-body to on-body [29]- [32] or on-body to implant [33], [34] communication using skin-attached electrodes with relatively large dimensions, which does not well represent the channel properties of implant-to-implant trans-dural communication in this work. Although galvanic coupling has been employed for implant-to-implant intra-cardiac communication [35], it only demonstrates an operation frequency below MHz for the ECG application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the use of LC-ADCs can result in up to two orders of magnitude reductions of data bandwidth and system energy consumption, especially when input signals are burst-like or sparse in time [18,22]. Since many biological signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) data, exhibit burst-like sparsity properties, a lot of attention has been paid to the application of LC-ADCs for ultra-low-power biomedical monitoring applications [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3(b) shows this proposed neuromorphic sensing system (NSS) concept [13]. It includes an ASC for delta encoding, a spiking neural network (SNN) for local computation, and a pulse-based TX tailored for low-energy, event-driven transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%