2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015jd024497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 26 year high‐resolution dynamical downscaling over the Wasatch Mountains: Synoptic effects on winter precipitation performance

Abstract: A 26 year high-resolution dynamical downscaling over the Wasatch Mountains of Utah, USA, was performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with initial and boundary conditions derived from Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Precipitation validation was conducted on the inner (4 km resolution) domain with Snowpack Telemetry (SNOTEL) and Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model data sets. Analysis of seasonal performance reveals the model's overall good skill at reproducing the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The projected climate results are consistent with other studies such as the climate projection for the Rocky Mountain headwaters of Colorado River (Christensen et al ; Ray et al ). The results of these downscaled climate projections in the State of Utah and the Jordan River basin are also reported in other studies (Scalzitti et al 2016a, b; Strong et al ; Khatri et al ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The projected climate results are consistent with other studies such as the climate projection for the Rocky Mountain headwaters of Colorado River (Christensen et al ; Ray et al ). The results of these downscaled climate projections in the State of Utah and the Jordan River basin are also reported in other studies (Scalzitti et al 2016a, b; Strong et al ; Khatri et al ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The statistical downscaling (Reclamation ) was based on more than 20 global climate models forced by four greenhouse gas emission scenarios, referred to as Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs; Vuuren et al ). For the dynamical downscaling, the high computational expense of our regional climate model configuration (Scalzitti et al 2016a, b) limited the simulation to a mid‐century decade (2035–2044) and a late‐century decade (2085–2094), both under the moderate greenhouse gas emission scenario RCP6.0. For consistency, we focus on climate inputs for the same two decades in the statistical downscaling archive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial conditions at the surface, atmosphere, and lateral boundary were derived from 3‐hourly Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) [ Saha et al , ] at 38 km grid spacing. Further details about this model's customization and performance in simulating winter precipitation on the inner domain d03 can be found in Strong et al [] and Scalzitti et al [, ]. For this study, we validated the historical simulation (hereafter denoted WRF Past ) on the middle domain d02 against Parameter‐elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) data [ Daly et al , , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework included a thermodynamic slab model of the Great Salt Lake with salinity adjustments to saturation vapor pressure over the lake (Strong et al, 2014). Additional configuration details and historical validation can be found in (Scalzitti et al, 2016). Although some of the input fields for E were available directly in the WRF output (e.g., net radiation), we used only T, V, p, S, and RH based on the water vapor mixing ratio from WRF, and derived the remaining variables as outlined in the ASCE-ET equation.…”
Section: Regional Climate Simulation Using Wrfmentioning
confidence: 99%