2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl082783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 250‐Year European Drought Inventory Derived From Ensemble Hydrologic Modeling

Abstract: We present a 250‐year (1766–2015) inventory of European meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural droughts derived from ensemble simulations of the mesoscale Hydrological Model (mHM). The inventory of droughts takes into account an ensemble of 100 simulations from the hydrological model, allowing for assessment of how different meteorological forcing and model parameterizations affect a drought ranking. For the most extreme droughts, the variability in the ranking of drought events is low, while for the y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of consecutive drought characteristics from 1766–2019 is performed over the central Europe using three types of observed gridded meteorologic datasets: Casty et al 22 for period 1766–1900, CRU TS dataset 23 for period 1901–1949; and E-OBS 45 for period 1950–2019. The composite dataset using monthly precipitation and air temperature is analysed at a spatial resolution of , similarly as in to previous studies 25 , 46 . Furthermore, the E-OBS is used for correcting possible biases in the Casty and CRU data, which is trained on the overlapping period 1950–2015 25 , 46 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assessment of consecutive drought characteristics from 1766–2019 is performed over the central Europe using three types of observed gridded meteorologic datasets: Casty et al 22 for period 1766–1900, CRU TS dataset 23 for period 1901–1949; and E-OBS 45 for period 1950–2019. The composite dataset using monthly precipitation and air temperature is analysed at a spatial resolution of , similarly as in to previous studies 25 , 46 . Furthermore, the E-OBS is used for correcting possible biases in the Casty and CRU data, which is trained on the overlapping period 1950–2015 25 , 46 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite dataset using monthly precipitation and air temperature is analysed at a spatial resolution of , similarly as in to previous studies 25 , 46 . Furthermore, the E-OBS is used for correcting possible biases in the Casty and CRU data, which is trained on the overlapping period 1950–2015 25 , 46 . To examine the characteristics of the consecutive droughts in the past and future, we procure the state-of-the-art global climate model simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) 38 (detailed description is provided in Supplementary Table S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is reflected by the aforementioned difficulty of separating human influence from natural drivers of hydrological drought (Van Loon et al, , ). For such reasons, endeavours such as large‐scale hydrological data rescue (e.g., Le Gros et al, ), reconstructing long‐term and large‐scale high‐resolution climate datasets (Devers, Vidal, Lauvernet, Graff, & Vannier, ) and corresponding near‐natural hydrological datasets (e.g., Hanel et al, ; Moravec, Markonis, Rakovec, Kumar, & Hanel, ) are central in understanding the large temporal and spatial variations of hydrology. Compatibility between, or merging of, national‐scale datasets (e.g., Caillouet, Vidal, Sauquet, Graff, & Soubeyroux, ; Keller et al, ) would be a further advance, as would improved quality assessment of large repositories such as the Global Runoff Data Centre under the auspices of the World Meteorological Organisation.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunities In Large‐scale Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, uncertainty in drought trends in Europe is linked to the use of different periods of analysis (Hannaford et al ., 2013) and deployment of a wide spectrum of possible drought metrics. The latter employ several hydroclimatic variables including, precipitation (Lloyd‐Hughes and Saunders, 2002; Vicente‐Serrano, 2006a), atmospheric evaporative demand (Vicente‐Serrano et al ., 2014b; Spinoni et al ., 2015; Stagge et al ., 2017), streamflow (Hisdal et al ., 2001; Parry et al ., 2012; Hannaford et al ., 2013; Lorenzo‐Lacruz et al ., 2013), groundwater (Lorenzo‐Lacruz et al ., 2017; Marchant and Bloomfield, 2018) and soil moisture simulations (Hanel et al ., 2018; Moravec et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%