2014
DOI: 10.4158/ep14067.or
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 24-Week, Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Treat-To-Target Pilot Study of Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance to Assess the Addition of Exenatide on the Efficacy of U-500 Regular Insulin Plus Metformin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 13 The two RCTs of U-500R also had algorithms using U-500R as insulin monotherapy. 15 16 This study is unique in being able to differentiate reduction in HbA1c postindex between those with U-500R use alone (group A; 0.78%) as compared with concomitant U-500R and U-100 therapy (group B; 0.60%) although groups A and B were not statistically different ( table 3 ). U-500R insulin monotherapy may also reduce the risk of dosing errors and confusion that might arise from concomitant use of non-dedicated U-100 insulin syringes or volumetric syringes for U-500R and U-100 insulins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… 13 The two RCTs of U-500R also had algorithms using U-500R as insulin monotherapy. 15 16 This study is unique in being able to differentiate reduction in HbA1c postindex between those with U-500R use alone (group A; 0.78%) as compared with concomitant U-500R and U-100 therapy (group B; 0.60%) although groups A and B were not statistically different ( table 3 ). U-500R insulin monotherapy may also reduce the risk of dosing errors and confusion that might arise from concomitant use of non-dedicated U-100 insulin syringes or volumetric syringes for U-500R and U-100 insulins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The overall HbA1c reduction of 0.68% in this cohort is statistically and clinically significant, but is less than that reported in the clinical case series (1.0–3.5% 4 6 7 18–20 ) and from the single RCT (1.0–1.7%). 15 However, this is not surprising since the prior clinical reports were conducted by investigators/institutions with particular clinical experience with use and titration of U-500R over time, thus likely representing more expert use than that captured by the Humedica EHR database for all U-500R use during the study period, within the prespecified study parameters. In addition, mean baseline HbA1c values for this study population were lower (9.1±1.7%) than in the reported case series (weighted mean HbA1c 10.0% 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over 12 weeks of follow-up study the authors reported a 1.4% drop in HbA1c from baseline along with a mean weight loss of 5.1 kg and a 28% decrease in insulin requirement. In another study by Distiller et al (9), exanetide was used with U500 insulin in 9 T2DM patients with suboptimal glycemic control. Interestingly, despite a 21% decrease in insulin requirement in the exanetide-treated patients, no significant decrease in HbA1c was noted in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%