2015
DOI: 10.1097/wad.0000000000000073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 24-Week, Open-Label Extension Study to Investigate the Long-term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of 13.3 mg/24 h Rivastigmine Patch in Patients With Severe Alzheimer Disease

Abstract: (current word count: 200)The long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of high-dose 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch in severe Alzheimer's disease was evaluated in a 24-week, open-label extension to the double-blind (DB) ACTION study. Safety and tolerability, and efficacy on the comparable. There were no clinically relevant between-group differences in safety and tolerability. Greater decline was observed in patients with delayed up-titration to highdose 13.3 mg/24 h patch than patients who continued on high-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a small dose-related increase in gastrointestinal-related AEs was seen, the high dose patch did not markedly reduce tolerability. In the subsequent openlabel extension study, patients who continued on their original 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch reported a similar incidence of AEs compared with patients who up-titrated from 4.6 mg/24 h to 13.3 mg/24 h [38].…”
Section: Rivastigminementioning
confidence: 83%
“…While a small dose-related increase in gastrointestinal-related AEs was seen, the high dose patch did not markedly reduce tolerability. In the subsequent openlabel extension study, patients who continued on their original 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch reported a similar incidence of AEs compared with patients who up-titrated from 4.6 mg/24 h to 13.3 mg/24 h [38].…”
Section: Rivastigminementioning
confidence: 83%
“…In an open-label extension study conducted for 24 weeks, there were not any significant clinical side effects while using rivastigmine in both low and high dose of transdermal rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderately severe AD [63] . However, the high transdermal dose has shown more positive impact on cognitive function in patients with AD, and it might be useful in the treatment of dementia of severe AD [63] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, transdermal rivastigmine, especially high transdermal dose, might give more improvement in AD dementia over oral rivastigmine because of the few reported incidents of forgetting doses in case of oral administration [62]. In an open‐label extension study conducted for 24 weeks, there were not any significant clinical side effects while using rivastigmine in both low and high dose of transdermal rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderately severe AD [63]. However, the high transdermal dose has shown more positive impact on cognitive function in patients with AD, and it might be useful in the treatment of dementia of severe AD [63].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 24-week, open-label extension of the ACTION study (N=397), there were no clinically relevant differences in safety and tolerability between patients who were up-titrated from the 4.6 mg/24h rivastigmine patch to receive the 13.3 mg/24h patch, and patients who continued on the 13.3 mg/24h patch. However, a greater decline was observed in patients with delayed up-titration to the high-dose 13.3 mg/24h patch compared to patients who continued on the high-dose patch from the double-blind phase to the extension phase [ 33 ]. This indicates the importance of early and sustained intervention with the high-dose patch to achieve maximum clinical benefit.…”
Section: Dose Up-titrationmentioning
confidence: 99%