2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 24-month dietary carcinogenicity study of DAG in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Male and female Crl:CD‐1 (ICR) BR mice (50 animals/group) were fed a diet containing diacylglycerol (rich in unsaturated fatty acids (> 95%)) for 24 months (Chengelis et al., ). Dietary concentrations (% diacylglycerol/% triacylglycerol) were 0%/6.0% (control), 1.5%/4.5%, 3.0%/3.0% and 6.0%/0%.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male and female Crl:CD‐1 (ICR) BR mice (50 animals/group) were fed a diet containing diacylglycerol (rich in unsaturated fatty acids (> 95%)) for 24 months (Chengelis et al., ). Dietary concentrations (% diacylglycerol/% triacylglycerol) were 0%/6.0% (control), 1.5%/4.5%, 3.0%/3.0% and 6.0%/0%.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a resultant false-positive rate of approximately 10%. The use of this multiple comparison adjustment procedure is widely used in the interpretation of rodent cancer bioassays (Chengelis et al, 2006;Heim et al, 2007;Long et al, 2009;Shuey et al, 2007;Thomas et al, 2007). Application of Lin and Rahman's criteria for statistical significance for trend to the astrocytoma data in the current study suggests that the observed marginal dose effect is probably a false positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The Haseman procedure has been extended to trend tests by Lin and Rahman (), who recommended significance levels of P < 0.005 and P < 0.025 for testing positive linear trend in incidence rate for common and rare tumors, respectively, with a resultant false‐positive rate of approximately 10%. The use of this multiple comparison adjustment procedure is widely used in the interpretation of rodent cancer bioassays (Chengelis et al ., ; Heim et al ., ; Long et al ., ; Shuey et al ., ; Thomas et al ., ). Application of Lin and Rahman's criteria for statistical significance for trend to the astrocytoma data in the current study suggests that the observed marginal dose effect is probably a false positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAG at dietary concentrations up to 9.5% for one year had no effect on normal dog growth and development, in comparison to TAG [ 38 ]. In mice, DAG at dietary concentrations up to 6.0% for 24 months produced no signs of systemic toxicity and had no effect on the incidence of neoplastic findings [ 39 ]. Most of studies investigating a chronic dietary toxicity of DAG reported that DAG did not produce systemic toxicity and had no effect on the incidence of neoplastic findings.…”
Section: A Safety Of a Chronic Consumption Of Dagmentioning
confidence: 99%