2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-013-2776-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 20-min nap in athletes changes subsequent sleep architecture but does not alter physical performances after normal sleep or 5-h phase-advance conditions

Abstract: Napping showed no reliable benefit on short-term performances of athletes exercising at local time or after a simulated jet lag.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research regarding the efficacy of napping is limited, but it seems that beneficial effects can be detected following sleep restriction 42 as well as following a 'normal' night of sleep. 43 However, Petit and colleagues 44 did not find positive effects of a 20-min nap on performance. On the other hand, they did not find negative effects on performance or on sleep architecture either.…”
Section: Sleep Extension and Nappingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research regarding the efficacy of napping is limited, but it seems that beneficial effects can be detected following sleep restriction 42 as well as following a 'normal' night of sleep. 43 However, Petit and colleagues 44 did not find positive effects of a 20-min nap on performance. On the other hand, they did not find negative effects on performance or on sleep architecture either.…”
Section: Sleep Extension and Nappingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One should consequently ask if napping may disturb subsequent night sleep, especially among players who are not accustomed to napping during the week. Petit et al [87] examined the effects of a postprandial 20-min nap on subsequent sleep in athletes. Postlunch naps were scheduled at 1:00 p.m. with subjects required to lie on a bed in a darkened room for 1 h. Subjects were awakened by intercom when approximately 20 min of sleep had elapsed.…”
Section: Napping and Night-time Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the normal sleep condition without napping, the sleep onset latency in a post-trial night was 13.3 ± 5.5 min and increased significantly after post-lunch naps, reaching higher values (24.3 ± 11.8 min; p \ 0.01). Consequently, a daytime nap may be encouraged as a strategy to counteract sleep debt and sleepiness [29]; however, it may induce more difficulties in falling asleep in the subsequent night [87]. Additionally, taking a nap may be associated with less efficient sleep the next night [88].…”
Section: Napping and Night-time Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…imal sleep inertia and contains mostly stage 2 non-REM sleep. Nonetheless, in a previous study, Petit et al [35,36] reported that this type of nap between 13:00 and 14:00 h or 08:00 and 09:00 h in non-shifted and shifted conditions respectively did not improve anaerobic physical performance but modified the circadian rhythm parameters. Conversely, research has consistently shown that daytime napping improves reaction times, attention [5,7,39,42], memory consolidation [33] and enhances physiological alertness [6,20,22,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The experimental design (sleep conditions, polysomnography recordings and scoring, post-lunch nap and rest recordings, core body temperature measurements) are described in detail in ▶Fig. 1 and has previously been described in detail in Petit et al [35].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%