2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa93d1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 20-channel magnetoencephalography system based on optically pumped magnetometers

Abstract: We describe a multichannel magnetoencephalography (MEG) system that uses optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) to sense the magnetic fields of the human brain. The system consists of an array of 20 OPM channels conforming to the human subject’s head, a person-sized magnetic shield containing the array and the human subject, a laser system to drive the OPM array, and various control and data acquisitions systems. We conducted two MEG experiments: auditory evoked magnetic field (AEF) and somatosensory evoked mag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
97
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(52 reference statements)
5
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent advances in the development of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) (Budker & Kimball, 2013;Budker & Romalis, 2007) has enabled their use in MEG (e.g., Borna et al, 2017;Boto et al, 2018;Iivanainen, Zetter, Grön, Hakkarainen, & Parkkonen, 2019;Sheng, Wan, et al, 2017). OPMs, in contrast to SQUIDs, can be placed in very close proximity to the scalp, considerably boosting both spatial resolution and sensitivity to neural sources (Boto et al, 2016;Iivanainen et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in the development of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) (Budker & Kimball, 2013;Budker & Romalis, 2007) has enabled their use in MEG (e.g., Borna et al, 2017;Boto et al, 2018;Iivanainen, Zetter, Grön, Hakkarainen, & Parkkonen, 2019;Sheng, Wan, et al, 2017). OPMs, in contrast to SQUIDs, can be placed in very close proximity to the scalp, considerably boosting both spatial resolution and sensitivity to neural sources (Boto et al, 2016;Iivanainen et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher spatial frequencies potentially lead to better spatial resolution, but also require denser spatial sampling. With 12.0 mm vertical and 13.4 mm diagonal center-to-center distances between adjacent sensors, the spatial sampling of the system presented here is higher compared to that of previously reported multi-channel on-scalp MEG systems (18 mm within 4-channel OPM in [23]; not specified in [21,22], but necessarily greater than the 13 mm x 19 mm sensor footprint [24]). Furthermore the sensor-to-head distance, ranging between 1 and 3 mm, is significantly smaller than in previously reported systems (12 mm in [23] and 6.5 mm in [21,22]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While on-scalp MEG with multiple single-channel units has been demonstrated with both high-T c SQUIDs [10] and optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) [21,22], the only previous report of a multi-channel system is with the latter technology [23]. Due to inherent advantages and disadvantages of high-T c SQUIDs compared to OPMs as well as specific design goals described below, our system differs in several key aspects from such on-scalp MEG systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst multi-channel systems are available (e.g. (Borna et al, 2017;Boto et al, 2018;Iivanainen et al, 2019b)), most demonstrations still employ small numbers of sensors sited over specific brain regions and the introduction of a whole-head array will be an important step forward. Sensor array coverage (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%