2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2-D comparison of ionospheric convection derived from SuperDARN and DMSP measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpret their data to have a saturation onset at around 3–5 mV/m for IMF due north. Their study does suggest a lower saturation level (20 kV), however a quantitative discrepancy is not unexpected as previous satellite measurements of the reverse convection potential have given values up to the order of 60–70 kV [ Taguchi and Hoffman , 1995], and comparative studies of convection velocities have shown SuperDARN to give lower values in general compared to DMSP [ Drayton et al , 2005; Xu et al , 2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We interpret their data to have a saturation onset at around 3–5 mV/m for IMF due north. Their study does suggest a lower saturation level (20 kV), however a quantitative discrepancy is not unexpected as previous satellite measurements of the reverse convection potential have given values up to the order of 60–70 kV [ Taguchi and Hoffman , 1995], and comparative studies of convection velocities have shown SuperDARN to give lower values in general compared to DMSP [ Drayton et al , 2005; Xu et al , 2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the past, this has been explained by the fact that the polar cap expands equatorward during increasingly strong driving, which could mean that the potential pattern is outside the SuperDARN radars' fields of view [ Hairston et al , 2005]. Recent studies, however, have compared line of site velocity vectors measured by SuperDARN with DMSP cross‐track plasma drift measurements and shown that the velocities measured by SuperDARN are 0.3 to 0.7 times smaller than those measured by DMSP [ Drayton et al , 2005; Xu et al , 2007]. Sundberg et al [2009] showed saturation of Φ RC using DMSP and also demonstrated it to occur at approximately one fourth the saturation Φ PC under southward IMF observed by Hairston et al [2005].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is clearly detectable at large drifts of >1 km/s. Xu et al (2008) statistically compared the DMSP velocity vectors and SuperDARN-inferred convection vectors and showed that the radar velocities are typically smaller than the DMSP ones. Several explanations for the differences have been proposed, including the fact that temporal and spatial resolution of the instruments is not the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%