“…Compilations of whole-rock Sm-Nd or zircon Lu-Hf isotopic model ages reveal ~2.7 Ga crustal growth along with crustal reworking at ~2.5 Ga (Wu et al, 2005;Geng et al, 2012;Wang and Liu, 2012). Alternatively, a Neoarchean subduction-related arc setting was advocated for the northern margin of the EB as well as for some of the Neoarchean complexes that have been involved in the Paleoproterozoic TNCO (Liu et al, 2002(Liu et al, , 2004(Liu et al, , 2011aDiwu et al, 2011;Kusky, 2011;Nutman et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011Wang et al, , 2012aWang et al, , 2013Wang et al, , 2015bWang et al, , 2016Guo et al, 2013Guo et al, , 2015aBai et al, 2014aBai et al, , 2016Deng et al, 2016). In particular, a ~2.6-2.5 Ga intra-oceanic arc was proposed to have formed along northwestern EB, marking a pulse of intense crustal growth within the craton (Wang et al, 2015b).…”