2007
DOI: 10.1109/rfic.2007.380834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2.4 to 5.4 GHz Low Power CMOS Reconfigurable LNA for Multistandard Wireless Receiver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the figure of merit (computed from gain, noise figure and power consumption), this amplifier had better performance than other recently reported frequency-reconfigurable LNAs [12][13][14] (even from those in more advanced technologies). This is because the f T degradation by locating C in at the base-emitter of Q 1 is compensated by the high Q available from the inductors to get low overall power.…”
Section: Low Noise Amplifiermentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Using the figure of merit (computed from gain, noise figure and power consumption), this amplifier had better performance than other recently reported frequency-reconfigurable LNAs [12][13][14] (even from those in more advanced technologies). This is because the f T degradation by locating C in at the base-emitter of Q 1 is compensated by the high Q available from the inductors to get low overall power.…”
Section: Low Noise Amplifiermentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Tuneable structures have been presented, for instance, by means of switched inductors and varactors. [5][6][7][8] In this paper, a novel tuneable matching network is proposed, from which a wide-range tuneable LNA is constructed. The continuously-tuneable frequency function is obtained by controlling the capacitance of the varactors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, high gain, low power, moderate linearity and good matching between input matching frequency and output resonance frequency are also required. Among different LNA structures, wideband [1,2], concurrent [3,4] and reconfigurable [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] LNAs have attracted extensive attention. A wideband LNA has flat gain and low return loss over a wide frequency range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discretely-tuned LNAs have attracted more attention than the continuously-tuned ones due to the fact that the discretely-tuned LNA can be easily reconfigured by means of switching on/off passive components [5][6][7]. However, for a larger number of frequency bands, discrete tuning is not suitable, as it is harder to design for good input matching and it necessitates additional passive components, which increases the overall area of the LNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%