2006 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/asscc.2006.357893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 19.7 MHz, 5th Order Active-RC Chebyshev LPF for IEEE802.11n with Automatic Quality Factor Tuning Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FOM of the filters presented here is better than those that have a comparably narrow transition band. 1 At an input signal level equal to the IIP3, the IM3 (extrapolated from smallsignal levels) is also equal to the IIP3. Since the third-order distortion increases at 3 dB for a 1-dB increase in the input signal, it can be worked out that the SNR is equal to 2/3(IIP3 − N ) when the distortion is equal to noise (both the IIP3 and N are in decibels).…”
Section: Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FOM of the filters presented here is better than those that have a comparably narrow transition band. 1 At an input signal level equal to the IIP3, the IM3 (extrapolated from smallsignal levels) is also equal to the IIP3. Since the third-order distortion increases at 3 dB for a 1-dB increase in the input signal, it can be worked out that the SNR is equal to 2/3(IIP3 − N ) when the distortion is equal to noise (both the IIP3 and N are in decibels).…”
Section: Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power dissipation is usually independent of the signal level. A figure of merit (FOM) inspired by the above relationship is the ratio of the power dissipated to the product of order n, bandwidth f B , and the SNR at an input amplitude for which IM3 is equal to the noise level, 1 and it is given by …”
Section: Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of them depends on the filter selectivity/order, design/circuit complexity, and power/chip size. In the literature, Butterworth [2, 5-7, 17, 20, 23, 25, 28, 38, 41], Chebyshev [3,4,19,25,26,32,33,36], and elliptic [4,22,24,25,27,36,37,40] approximations all have been popularly used for baseband channel filters with the Butterworth type used more often due to the ease of design and simplicity in structure. Reference [3] also designs an inverse Chebyshev filter.…”
Section: Structures For High-order Analogue Baseband Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While high bandwidth MOSFET-RC filters usually dissipate more power than other filter types, precise Q tuning methods can reduce the total power consumption by optimizing the operational amplifier biasing currents [10,11]. Nonetheless, one of the major drawbacks of continuous MOSFET-RC tuning is the linearity degradation due to the non-linear transistor behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%