2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 10-Year Prospective Audit of LASIK Outcomes for Myopia in 37932 Eyes at a Single Institution in Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
72
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is the most common and popular corneal refractive surgery worldwide. 1,2 Corneal refractive surgery presents a unique problemdintraocular lens (IOL) power calculationd when cataract surgery is subsequently required. [3][4][5] The challenges of IOL power calculations after refractive surgery can be attributed to the following 3 factors: cornea radius error, 6 refractive index error, 7 and formula error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is the most common and popular corneal refractive surgery worldwide. 1,2 Corneal refractive surgery presents a unique problemdintraocular lens (IOL) power calculationd when cataract surgery is subsequently required. [3][4][5] The challenges of IOL power calculations after refractive surgery can be attributed to the following 3 factors: cornea radius error, 6 refractive index error, 7 and formula error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become the most popular laser-based method of treating refractive errors today 1 and has an established long-term predictability, safety, and efficacy record. 2 Refractive lenticular extraction is a new procedure in which an intrastromal refractive lenticule is excised with the femtosecond laser without the use of a microkeratome or excimer laser. Two refractive lenticular extraction procedures are currently performed at our center.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miscorrections ≥ 1.00 D were prevalent in up to 59% of cases in reports over the period 1994-97 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. More recently, a retrospective study on 37,932 procedures treated between 1998-2007 revealed post-op refraction off target greater than ± 1D in just 7% of cases [9]. Since 2000, the reported rate for retreatment averages at about 4% [10][11][12], increasing to 20% in myopic patients after 10 years according to one source [13].The original nomograms for excimer laser photoablation were based on relatively simple spherical optics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%