A 10 year (2000–2010) systematic review of interventions to improve quality of care in hospitals

Abstract

BackgroundAgainst a backdrop of rising healthcare costs, variability in care provision and an increased emphasis on patient satisfaction, the need for effective interventions to improve quality of care has come to the fore. This is the first ten year (2000–2010) systematic review of interventions which sought to improve quality of care in a hospital setting. This review moves beyond a broad assessment of outcome significance levels and makes recommendations for future effective and accessible interventions.MethodsTwo researchers independently screened a total of 13,195 English language articles from the databases PsychInfo, Medline, PubMed, EmBase and CinNahl. There were 120 potentially relevant full text articles examined and 20 of those articles met the inclusion criteria.ResultsIncluded studies were heterogeneous in terms of approach and scientific rigour and varied in scope from small scale improvements for specific patient groups to large scale quality improvement programmes across multiple settings. Interventions were broadly categorised as either technical (n = 11) or interpersonal (n = 9). Technical interventions were in the main implemented by physicians and concentrated on improving care for patients with heart disease or pneumonia. Interpersonal interventions focused on patient satisfaction and tended to be implemented by nursing staff. Technical interventions had a tendency to achieve more substantial improvements in quality of care.ConclusionsThe rigorous application of inclusion criteria to studies established that despite the very large volume of literature on quality of care improvements, there is a paucity of hospital interventions with a theoretically based design or implementation. The screening process established that intervention studies to date have largely failed to identify their position along the quality of care spectrum. It is suggested that this lack of theoretical grounding may partly explain the minimal transfer of health research to date into policy. It is recommended that future interventions are established within a theoretical framework and that selected quality of care outcomes are assessed using this framework. Future interventions to improve quality of care will be most effective when they use a collaborative approach, involve multidisciplinary teams, utilise available resources, involve physicians and recognise the unique requirements of each patient group.

Factors Determining Quality of Care in Family Planning Services in Africa: A Systematic Review of Mixed Evidence

“…Literature relating to quality of care in family planning services found that a number of approaches have been used to define and measure quality of care in family planning services and its determinants, and these vary with the stakeholders’ priorities and perspectives [25]. The Donabedian [26,27] and Bruce Frameworks [28] are the two conceptual frameworks that have been used most frequently since the early 1990s to inform empirical work assessing the quality of family planning services and factors that determine quality of care in family planning services.…”

Effects of patient safety culture interventions on incident reporting in general practice: a cluster randomised trial

“…Furthermore, an educational part on safety science (such as the state of affairs, terminology, and examples) was added to the workshop. Education is perceived as important in quality improvement 38 and is the most important factor to improve patient safety in primary care. 39 The aim was to educate staff on safety science providing them with a sense of urgency concerning safety in general practice, in order to instigate change.…”

Quality of care and health professional burnout: narrative literature review

“…Our review, part of the ORCAB FP7 project (Montgomery et al, 2011;Conry et al, 2012;McGowan et al, 2013), explores the link between organizational culture, healthcare professional burnout and quality. Focusing on quality and staff burnout in the current climate is important because deteriorating working conditions in the health sector threaten service quality and patient safety (Kingma, 2009).…”