2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-018-1152-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 10-min Targeted Geriatric Assessment Predicts Mortality in Fast-Paced Acute Care Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The 10-minute Targeted Geriatric Assessment (10-TaGA) [14] is a validated multidomain hands-on instrument that was developed to screen geriatric syndromes and estimate the global impairment of patients, using the cumulative de cit model. In previous research, 10-TaGA provided adequate validity and good accuracy in discriminating between frail and non-frail individuals and good predictive power for one-year mortality, disability and hospitalization [14,16,17]. This quick and easy-to-administer CGA-based tool assembles objective measures and selfreported information in an e cient method that evaluates ten health domains: (1) social support (living arrangements and availability of help) [18]; (2) emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the previous six months; (3) the number of falls in previous 12 months; (4) the number of medications; (5) dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) (Katz index) [19]; (6) 10-point Cognitive Screener (10-CS) [20]; (7) self-rated health; (8) 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) score [21]; (9) nutritional status (weight loss in the previous 12 months, BMI and calf circumference); (10) gait speed [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 10-minute Targeted Geriatric Assessment (10-TaGA) [14] is a validated multidomain hands-on instrument that was developed to screen geriatric syndromes and estimate the global impairment of patients, using the cumulative de cit model. In previous research, 10-TaGA provided adequate validity and good accuracy in discriminating between frail and non-frail individuals and good predictive power for one-year mortality, disability and hospitalization [14,16,17]. This quick and easy-to-administer CGA-based tool assembles objective measures and selfreported information in an e cient method that evaluates ten health domains: (1) social support (living arrangements and availability of help) [18]; (2) emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the previous six months; (3) the number of falls in previous 12 months; (4) the number of medications; (5) dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) (Katz index) [19]; (6) 10-point Cognitive Screener (10-CS) [20]; (7) self-rated health; (8) 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) score [21]; (9) nutritional status (weight loss in the previous 12 months, BMI and calf circumference); (10) gait speed [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Each domain is categorized and scored as normal (0 points), mild impairment (0.5 points), or severe impairment (1 point), based on validated cut-off points against conventional and more extended instruments that are widely used in practice to assess each geriatric condition [14]. While 10-TaGA captures health de cits in multiple domains using rapid geriatric measures, which might be considered super cial, the tool proved to be a practical and e cient method to introduce the CGA in busy clinical settings where time-consuming instruments are unfeasible [14,16,17]. Based on previous work demonstrating the good predictive power of 10-TaGA for one-year mortality, we classi ed participants as having low (0-0.24), medium (0.25-0.49), or high (0.50-1) risk of death [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we screened for the presence of visual and auditive de cits ("yes" or "no") using the following questions, is calculated, dividing the total sum of points by the number of evaluated domains [14]. Based on previous work demonstrating the good predictive power of 10-TaGA for one-year mortality, we classi ed participants as having low (0-0.24), medium (0.25-0.49), or high (0.50-1) risk of death [17].…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size calculations. Based on the 10-TaGA classi cation for mortality risk, we estimated our sample size using the log-rank test for comparisons of 12-month survival across three groups (low, medium, and high risk), with a proportion between groups of 1: 2: 1, respectively [17]. Assuming a one-year mortality rate of 2.5% in the lowest risk group [17], an alternative bilateral hypothesis, an alpha error of 0.05%, a beta error of 0.20 and an estimated sample loss of 15%, we projected that a total sample of 1,081 participants would be required to detect 5% differences between the groups.…”
Section: Analyses Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acrescentaríamos, ainda, um sexto e último M, de multidisciplinaridade, pois o cuidado desses idosos deve estar coordenado de forma horizontal por um profissional, mas nunca isolado em sua figura, sendo importante a participação de outros especialistas e profissionais de saúde. Na Unidade de Cardiogeriatria do InCor, para todos os pacientes é realizada uma avaliação geriátrica ampla com o auxílio da ferramenta TAGA-10 (Targeted Geriatric asssesment) 10,11 A Evolução da Cardiogeriatria…”
Section: A Essência Da Cardiogeriatriaunclassified