2003
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2003.810048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1-Mbit MRAM based on 1T1MTJ bit cell integrated with copper interconnects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches have been used in the past to address this issue. [20][21][22][23] In this study, we have demonstrated highperformance RRAM with a write current of 10 lA and a programming speed of 10 ns. Figure 1a compares NAND Flash, RRAM, PRAM, and MRAM (magnetic RAM) with respect to write performance using currently reported data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been used in the past to address this issue. [20][21][22][23] In this study, we have demonstrated highperformance RRAM with a write current of 10 lA and a programming speed of 10 ns. Figure 1a compares NAND Flash, RRAM, PRAM, and MRAM (magnetic RAM) with respect to write performance using currently reported data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The write cycle time and the read access time were both of 30 ns but the average write and read currents were high with 80 mA and 25 mA, respectively [43]. One way to reduce the write currents in the bit and digit lines is the use of cladded Cu lines [44]. This technique, first proposed by Motorola, consists in embedding the Cu lines on three faces in magnetic materials with high permeability such as NiFe.…”
Section: Hxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find their place in the solid-state memory market, future magnetic random access memories (MRAM, [1]) should operate above the GHz range and have cell sizes below 100 nm. Major hurdles will be encountered when aiming to switch such cells' magnetization with magnetic fields generated by word and bit lines, either using conventional Stoner-Wohlfarth switching or using its precessional counterpart [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%